define thinking acc to the APA definition
APA definition → cognitive behaviour in which ideas, images, mental representations or other hypothetical elements of thoughts are experienced or manipulated. It is covert and symbolic
who theorized the 2 different ways of thinking model?
what are the 2 ways called?
Daniel Kahneman
System 1 & System 2
System 1
quick, effortless
–> lack of control
–> ideal for quick, non-important decisions
–> often falls prey to bias and heuristics
System 2
Slow, deliberate, controlled and effortful
when are decisions fully optimal? does this usually happen?
when we have all the necessary knowledge
–> almost never happens
–> we’re typically functioning under a certain degree of uncertainty
do the systems work together or against each other?
complement each other generally but depends on the situation
what 2 types of behaviour do we typically engage in?
*THO BOTH ARE OPEN TO BIAS
what is a good thing about our irrational behaviour tho?
we are predictably irrational, our errors are systematic and consistent
–> we can therefore empirically understand ourselves
which type of thinking tends to be more reliable?
slow thinking
–> still open to errors
–> and often we are literally unable to think slowly due to external factors
what are heuristics
mental shortcuts, part of quick thinking (S1)
–> allow us to make decisions quickly and efficiently but very prone to error, biases and irrelevant info
are heuristics generally bad?
no, they’re very beneficial and not entirely irrational
–> in fact, in many situations, they’re better than more rational models
–> especially bc these are often not practical for everyday life
–> you just have to be super aware that they can fall strongly into a propensity of errors
name the 7 main types of heuristics
representativeness
= The likelihood of an event is estimated based on how closely it matches or represented related examples or stereotypes, ignoring prior possibilities
–> probability judgements are influenced by similarities to a preconception
what do we ignore due to the representativeness heuristic?
base rate frequencies / prior probabilities
what is one example of the representativeness heuristic?
Steve, a quiet meek person who is always helpful, we tend to assume that he would be a librarian rather than a farmer
–> And yet we all recognize that there are more farmers than librarians, so statistically, he would be more likely to be a farmer
Conjunction fallacy
= The false assumption that a combination of conditions is more likely than either
condition by itself
what is one example of the conjunction fallacy?
Linda is a bank teller vs Linda is a feminist bank teller
law of sample size
smaller sample sizes produce more variance
–> and yet when making predictions between larger and smaller samples we ignore this
misconceptions of chance
we expect a series of events to look random
–> H-H-H-T-H-T-T seems more probable than H-H-H-H-T-T-T-T
–> but both are equally likely
gambler’s fallacy
faulty reasoning that past events in a sequence will affect the likelihood of future events
hot hand effect
perception of being in a roll
–> People seek patterns where there are none, leading to biased illusions that someone is more likely to do better bc they previously did better
availability
= Shows that people estimate the frequency of an event based on how easily examples
come into mind
why do we have the availability heuristic?
USUALLY the ease of thinking of examples is a useful cue for judging the frequency or probability of an event
–> but in situations of danger, other factors like media coverage enhance the salience
what is an example of the availability heuristic?
we’re more scared of less common but more salient dangers (shark attacks) and less scared of more common but less salient dangers (skin cancer)
–> when asked whether words beginning with r or having r as its third letter are more common, we tend to say that the first are more common