What are the 4 stages of Language comprehension
1)encode
2)indentify and access meanings
3)apply knowledge of rules
4)create interpretation of message
psycholinguistics
interdisciplinary field that examines how people use language to communicate ideas
phoneme
basic unit of language
how many phonemes in the english language
40
morpheme
basic unit of meaning
morphology
the study of morphemes (examines how we create words by combining morphemes)
syntax
grammatical rules that govern how we organize words into sentences
grammar
encompasses both morphology and syntax
semantics
examines the meanings of words and sentences
pragmatics
knowledge of the social rules that govern language, takes into account listeners perspective/context
What did chomsky believe about our knowledge of grammar
inborn knowledge of grammatical rules regardless of language specific qualities
(tries to explain how we can make sentences we’ve never heard before)
surface structure
words that are actually spoken or written
deep structure
underlying, more abstract meaning of a sentence
transformational rules
convert deep structure into surface structure that they can speak or write
ambiguous sentences
identical surface structure but very different deep structure
what are some problems with Chomsky’s theory
cognitive funcitonal approach
function of human language in everyday life is to communicate meaning to other individuals
sentences in the negative vs positive
process sentences in the negative slower than those in the positive
active sentences vs passive
active sentences easier to understand
incremental interpretation
when processing a language we do not wait until an entire sentence is spoken before making judgements about its meaning
on-line language processing measures
gauge amount of difficulty one experiences as the linguistic signal unfolds unit-by-unit over time
what is a good indication of processing difficulty?
reaction time
lexical ambiguity
a single word can have multiple meanings
how do we chose meaning of a word
probability and sentence context