define coding
the way information is stored in different memory stores
outline the research on coding
Baddeley’s study: gave 4 different groups of pps a different list of words to memorise: grp 1- acoustically similar, 2- acoustically dissimilar, 3- semantically similar, 4- semantically dissimilar. Found that when asked to recall from STM (right away) acoustically similar did the worse, whilst when asked to recall from LTM, semantically similar performed worst recall. Conclusion: STM is coded acoustically, and LTM is coded semantically.
define capacity
how much info a memory store can hold
outline the two studies done on capacity
1) Jacobs: he measured digit span. researchers read out 4 digits to pps and they had to recall in correct order. If the order was correct, researchers added another digit until they could no longer recall in the correct order. Found that for digits the mean span was 9.3 and for letters it was 7.3.
Miller: observed that many things come in 7s. e.g. 7 days of the week. concluded that STM for capacity is 7 +/- 2.
Research on duration of STM
Peterson and Peterson: study done on 24 students. They gave each one a consonant syllable to remember and also a 3 digit number to count backwards from until they were told to stop (done to prevent maintenance rehearsal). They were told to stop counting at varying points: after 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds. At 3 seconds, recall= 80%, 18 seconds 3%. STM duration= 18 seconds.
Research on Duration in LTM
Bahrick et al: studied LTM in 392 American graduates aged 17-74. Recall was tested using photo recognition of 50 photos some of which from their graduating class and it was also tested using free recall where they had to name all pps in their graduating class. They found that after 15 yrs graduation, 90% accuracy for photo recognition and 60% for free recall. After 48 yrs graduation, 70% accuracy photo recognition and 30% free recall. LTM can last up to a lifetime.
Evaluation of studies on coding, capacity and duration
For Baddeley, Jacobs and Peterson and Peterson: artificial stimuli was used and not meaningful material- difficult to say how their findings can relate to everyday life situations.
Bahrick et al: has external validity as meaningful stimuli used.
Jacob: been replicated many times to produce the same findings.
describe how information flows through the multi-store model of memory
all info enters the sensory register. if you pay attention to the info it goes into the STM store. If prolonged rehearsal is done it goes into the LTM. In retrieval it goes back to the STM.
The sensory register
this is the first part of the MSM. All info first passes into here. It has five different memory stores for each sense. Coding in this store depends on the sense e.g. the store coding for visual info is iconic memory and the store coding acoustically is for echoic memory. The duration is less than half a second. it has a very high capacity.
The short term memory store in the MSM
coded acoustically, duration= 18 seconds limited capacity. If prolonged rehearsal happens then it goes into LTM.
the long term memory store in the MSM
permanent memory store. codes semantically. believed to have duration lasting for lifetime. capacity- unlimited.
Evaluation of the multi-store model of memory
PEEL+: strength, supporting research that STM and LTM are separate stores. e.g. Baddeley found that asking pps to recall from STM- did worse on acoustically similar whilst when asking to recall from LTM did worse on semantically similar- indicates that STM codes acoustically and LTM codes semantically highlighting that they are different stores as the MSM suggests. However, many studies, including Baddeley, Jacobs, and Peterson and Peterson that show the differences between STM and LTM use artificial stimuli. This lowers the validity of their findings as they do not reflect everyday life. This means that perhaps information is stored differently when its more meaningful information as it would be in everyday life, limiting the findings of these studies, and therefore limiting the MSM.
PEEL+: Limitation, evidence for more than one STM store. Shallice and Warrington study on KF- had amnesia due to brain injury from motorcycle accident. STM for digits when read to him= poor but when read to himself significantly improved. This supports the idea that within the STM there are separate stores for sound and visual info. However, it’s unclear whether KF had any other cognitive impairments which may have affected his performance on the memory task. In addition to this, this is a case study only done on one person and so it is difficult to generate nomothetic laws of behaviour for an entire population.
name the 4 parts of the working memory model
1) central executive
2) phonological loop
3) visuo-spatial sketchpad
4) episodic buffer
central executive function
monitors incoming data, focuses our limited attention, and coordinates the activities of the 3 subsystems.
it has a limited capacity.
does not store information.
phonological loop
deals with auditory info and so codes acoustically. it maintains the order in which info arrives.
divided into: phonological store which stores word heard and read, and the articulatory process which is responsible for maintenance rehearsal.
visuo-spatial sketchpad
stores visual and spatial information. it has a limited capacity.
subdivided into:
1) visual cache- stores visual info
2) inner scribe- deals with spatial and movement based data.
Episodic Buffer
a temporary store for info, integrating all auditory, visual and spatial information into one memory. It maintains the order of events in which the memories happened. Links WMM to LTM.
Evaluation of the WMM
PEEL+: a strength is supporting research. In Shallice and Warrington’s case study they studied a client called KF who had experienced brain injury. When words read to him he struggled to recall from STM but when he read them to himself, he could easily recall them. Phonological loop damaged but visuo-spatial sketchpad still worked. However, unknown whether KF had other cognitive problems which may have affected his ability to do well in the memory task. Furthermore, it is a case study so it is difficult to create nomothetic laws from just one study.
PEEL+: limitation is research contradicting the WMM. In the case study of EVR, after he had his tumor removed, part of his central executive (CE) still worked as he had a high IQ. However, he no longer had the ability to make decisions which suggests that part of his CE was damaged. Criticises WMM as suggests incomplete. In addition to this, Baddeley further suggests that there’s a lack of clarity over the nature of the CE. He claims that it’s the most important part of the WMM, yet the least info is known about it further indicating that the WMM is incomplete.
what are the three types of LTM
1) episodic memory
2) semantic memory
3) procedural memory
episodic memory
recalling memories of events from our lives.
it’s time stamped (remember when they happened)
must make a conscious effort to recall
Semantic memory
memory for shared knowledge of the world
not time stamped
don’t make conscious effort to recall
less vulnerable to forgetting then episodic
procedural memory
the memory for skills and actions
they eventually become unconscious
it’s not time-stamped
difficult to describe in words
Evaluation of long term memory
PEEL+: supporting research from case study. Clive Wearing had a damaged hippocampus. He was unable to remember an event 30 seconds after it happened but he could remember how to play the piano and remembered his wife. This shows that his episodic memory was damaged whilst his semantic and procedural memory remained intact. This supports the idea that there are different long term memory stores. However, there is a lack of control over variables in this study. This is because the researchers had no control over what happened in Wearing’s life before the infection which means that they don’t know how much damage was caused by the infection. Furthermore, it is a case study and so only done on one person making it difficult to generalise the findings to all.
PEEL+: there’s supporting evidence that LTM has different types of memory from brain scans. In Buckner and Peterson’s study they found in their review of neuroimaging evidence that semantic memory is located on the left side of the prefrontal cortex and episodic memory is on the right. However, this has been challenged by Tulving who found that coding of episodic memory occurs on the left side of the prefrontal cortex and retrieval happens on the right side. This is significant as the two findings indicate a lack of agreement between researchers on where different types of long term memory are located. Therefore, although there is evidence that there are different types of long term memory due to different locations, the locations are not confirmed and so lowers the validity and understanding of different types of LTM.
interference theory- why does forgetting occur?
forgetting occurs when two pieces of information from memory disrupt each other causing forgetting of one or both memories, or distortion of the memories.