“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli et al. JVD. 2018:35(2).
what category of orthodontic treatment do temporary crown extensions belong to?
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli et al. JVD. 2018:35(2).
what was the percentage of cases in which crown extensions fractured or detached?
Fractured or detached crown extensions in 9/72 (12.5%) dogs
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli et al. JVD. 2018:35(2).
how many cases required TCE adjustments during treatment?
38/72 (52.8%) required 1
5/72 (6.9%) required 2
1/72 (1.4%) required 3
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli et al. JVD. 2018:35(2).
what was the success rate of temporary crown extensions for correction of linguoverted mandibular canine teeth?
98.6%
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)” . Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what are some sequelae of LMC?
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)” . Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what are the 3 categories of orthodontic treatment?
preventative:
interceptive:
corrective:
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
in regards to CORRCTIVE ORTHODONTICS, what are 2 different types of appliances and 2 different modes of action? name examples
removable or fixed;
active continuous force OR passive intermittent force;
removable:
* inclined plane (IP) of acrylic or silicone snapped onto teeth
* kong balls
fixed:
* Inclined plane
* TCE
passive force:
* IP
* TCE
active force:
* masel chain
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what steps were taken when placing TCE on LMC?
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what were the malocclusion classes? severity?
what was the mean overall Tx time (when excluding 4 outliers)?
what was the association between treatment times and MAL class? gender?
malocclusion class:
* MAL1: 53/72 (73.6%)
* MAL2: 14/72 (19.5%)
* MAL3: 5/72 (6.9%)
mandibular canine malocclusion severity:
* mild in 25/72 (34.7%)
* moderate in 32/72 (44.4%)
* severe in 15/72 (20.8%)
mean overall Tx time 42.7 days (outliers included poor owner compliance or issues with travel).
No significant difference between treatment times for 3 classes of MAL or gender.
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what are some noted shortcomings of acrylic IP overcome by TCEs listed by the authors?
inclined planes (IP):
TCE
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
what percentage of dogs had complications? what were they?
25% (18/72) dogs had complications:
“Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)”. Storli, Menzies, Reiter. JVD 2018.
was there a breed overrepresentation?
Staffordshire Bull Terrier 11/72 (15%) dogs; genetic potential was discussed with all owners
“Prevalence of Malocclusion of Deciduous Dentition in Dogs: An Evaluation of 297 Puppies”. Hoyer & Rawlinson. JVD 2019:36(4).
what was the percentage of puppies with malocclusions?
26% (77/297) were identified as having a malocclusion
“Prevalence of Malocclusion of Deciduous Dentition in Dogs: An Evaluation of 297 Puppies”. Hoyer & Rawlinson. JVD. 2019:36(4).
what was the difference between the prevalence of malocclusions in purebred vs mixed breed puppies? when evaluating single dogs? litters?
No significant difference in prevalence was noted between mixed breed and purebred dogs.
For single dogs, purebreds had a significantly higher percentage of malocclusions (33.8%) compared to the mixed breeds (20%).
For dogs in litters, there were no purebreds with malocclusion (0%), which was significantly less than the number of mixed breeds with malocclusions (23.5%).
Functional or dynamic occlusion
The active tooth contacts made during mastication and swallowing
JVD 2024. Martin F. A. Hamilton, Lorraine A. Hiscox. “Clinical Characterisation of Caudal Traumatic Malocclusions and Treatment Outcomes in Cats (2018-2022)”.
What age range was observed in affected cats?
What were the primary reasons for referral of affected cats?
age: 0.5 to 19 years (mean 5.12 years, median 4.0).
reasons for refferal:
* periodontal disease 49%
* traumatic caudal malocclusion 25%
* dentoalveolar trauma 10%
* oral neoplasia 6%
* oral pain 4%
* gingivostomatitis 4%
* MAL3 2%
JVD 2023. Marissa Berman, Maria Soltero-Rivera, Amy J Fulton Scanlan. “Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018)”.
What was the prevalence of malocclusions in the dolico and mesaticephalic dogs in this study?
13.7% (216/1573) dogs were diagnosed with at least one type of malocclusion.
JVD 2023. Marissa Berman, Maria Soltero-Rivera, Amy J Fulton Scanlan. “Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018)”.
What were the deciduous malocclusions?
26% (19/74) dogs had more than one type
JVD 2023. Berman et al. “Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018)”.
What were the most common types of MAL in dogs with permanent teeth?
35% (70/198) dogs had more than one type.
JVD 2023. Marissa Berman, Maria Soltero-Rivera, Amy J Fulton Scanlan. Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018).
Which type of MAL was the most frequent permanent malocclusion?
128/198 (65%) MAL1
Linguoversion of one or both MN Canines was the most common MAL1, observed in 72% (92/128).
JVD 2023. Marissa Berman, Maria Soltero-Rivera, Amy J Fulton Scanlan. Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018).
Which dog breeds had the highest prevalence of MAL? deciduous/permanent MAL?
MAL:
* poodles 18% (39/216)
* labrador retriever 9% (20/216)
* chihuahuas 8% (18/216)
* Pit Bull Terriers 7% (16/216)
deciduous MAL:
* Poodles 34% (25/74)
* Labrador Retrievers 9.5% (7/74)
* Cavalier King Charles Spaniels 7% (5/74)
permanent MAL:
* poodles 15% (29/198)
* labrador retriever
* chihuahuas
* Pit Bull Terriers
* Cavalier King Charles Spaniel
JVD 2023. Berman et al. Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018).
Was there a genetic pattern in MAL occurrence?
Poodle mixes and Labrador Retrievers showed a familial pattern of MAL, suggesting a hereditary component.
JVD 2023. Berman et al. Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018).
What % of dogs with deciduous MAL that underwent interceptive orthodontics also developed permanent MAL?
82% (45/55)
JVD 2023. Berman et al. “Prevalence of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Mesaticephalic and Dolichocephalic Dogs - a Retrospective Study (2015-2018)”.
What % of dogs had both deciduous and permanent MAL? how many of them had the same deciduous and permanent MAL?
66.7% (144/216) dogs had known malocclusion of both the deciduous and permanent dentition.
15% (22/144) of these dogs had the same malocclusion in both the adult and deciduous dentition.