Research Methods - Self-report techniques Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

Questionnaires

A

A research instrument made of a series of written questions designed to collect information from participants
- on paper, online or via text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

open questions

A

questions that allow respondents to answer in their words
-qualitative data
-respondents give as much/little detail as they want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

strengths of open Qs

A

more detail
more accurate -increases validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

limitations of open Qs

A

difficult to analyse
cannot be statistically compared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

closed Qs

A

provides respondents with a set of pre-determined answers
-quant data
-4 types: forced/fixed choice, likert scale, semantic differential and rating scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

forced/fixed choices

A

limited range of answers to choose from
E.G. yes/no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strengths of f/f choices

A

easy to analyse
can statistically compare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

limitations of f/f choices

A

no detail
doesn’t reflect true feelings -decreases validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

likert scale

A

level of dis/agreement with a statement on a multi-point scale
E.G.
strongly disagree>disagree>neutral<agree<strongly agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strengths of likert scale

A

more understanding of respondent’s opinion
easy to analyse and compare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

limitations of likert scale

A

central-tendency bias (choosing middle choice consstently)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

semantic differential

A

rate a concept on a scale between 2 bi-polar (opposite) adjectives
E.G.
rate _____ on this scale
effective - - - - - ineffective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths of semantic differential

A

more understanding of respondent’s opinion
easy to analyse and compare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

limitations of semantic differential

A

central-tendency bias
subjective (can be interpreted differently)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

rating scale

A

assign a value (usually numerical) to show assessment of experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strengths of rating scale

A

more understanding of respondent’s opinion
easy to analyse and compare

17
Q

limitations of rating scale

A

no detail
central tendency bias
subjective

18
Q

questionnaire do’s

A

brief Ps b4 questionnaire
the purpose and use of data is clear
no ambiguous Qs
simple lang is needed

19
Q

questionnaire don’ts

A

overlapping choices
ask personal details
technical terms that can cause confusion

20
Q

stages of questionnaire development

A

1- attitude/behaviours they want to investigate/measure
2- quant/qual data
3- run a pilot study
4- modify questionnaire due to pilot study results

21
Q

strengths of questionnaires

A

cheap + quick to gather large amount of data
anonymous results increase honesty and therefore validity

22
Q

limitations of questionnaires

A

social desirability
can lack generalisability
poorly designed Qs create flaws

23
Q

interviews

A

researchers asks Ps Qs to collect info on their thoughts, feelings, behaviours and experiences
- done on call/in person
- individual or group

24
Q

structured interviews

A

predetermined set of Qs in set order
- ensures reliability

25
strengths of structured interviews
collect useful demographic data can be checked for reliability easy to analyse+compare
26
limitations of structured interviews
doesn't allow expanded respond **-reduce validity** not ecologically valid
27
semi-structured interviews
guided framework/Qs - spontaneous follow-up Qs if interviewer thinks needed
28
strengths of semi-structured interviews
more detailed, in-depth data
29
limitations of semi-structured interviews
highly trained interviewer **-costs money** only reliable to certain extent (differing follow-up Qs) subjective
30
unstructured interviews
set topic with no set Qs more conversational led by interviewee but led by interviewer explores topic in detail
31
strengths of unstructured interviews
more detailed, in-depth data less demand characteristics ecological validity
32
limitations of unstructured interviews
not replicable **therefore unreliable** subjective time-consuming needs trained interviewer **(costs money)**
33
strength of interviews
collect data on mental state allows Ps to freely express themselves provides detailed info
34
limitations of interviews
time consuming - compared to questionnaires investigator effects less valid due to social desirablilties
35
what is a self-report?
questionnaires and interviews
36
strengths of self-reports
detail on thoughts and feelings
37
limitations of self-reports
social desirability **- lacks validity**