Disparate outcomes
Groups end up with different average results like pay or promotions.
Disparate treatment
People are treated differently because of a protected trait like sex or race.
Four‑factor framework
Treatment by decision makers
Skills and experience
Choices under limits
Rules or market forces
Compensating differentials
Extra pay for jobs with unpleasant or risky conditions.
Human capital
Skills and experience that make you more productive.
Continuous tenure
Unbroken time in a job that builds learning and promotion chances.
Overtime premium
Higher pay rate for hours beyond a set limit or for nights and weekends.
Temporal flexibility
Control over when and how long you work.
Extensive margin
Whether someone gets or takes a job at all.
Intensive margin
How much someone works or which shifts they take once in the job.
Wage schedule
A fixed pay grid by role and tenure used by a firm or union.
Pipeline
The path from school to career; early drop-offs shrink the later pool
Outcome fix
Policy that forces results to look equal fast.
Fundamental fix
Policy that tackles root causes so change lasts.
Gaming at later margins
Meeting targets on hires but shifting bias to assignments or evaluations.
Explained component
Part of a gap tied to measured factors like job type or hours.
Unexplained component
The leftover gap after controls that may reflect treatment or missing factors.
Statistical discrimination
Using group averages to judge people when info is missing.
Audit study
Field test that sends equal applications with one trait changed at random to see bias.
Gender‑equality paradox
More equal societies can show bigger interest gaps because people can choose freely.
Achievement
What you have already done like grades.
Aptitude
Your potential to learn or perform.
Upper‑tail quantitative ability
Very high math ability found in a small share of people.
Spatial ability
Skill at mental rotation and visualizing shapes.