In dermatologic surgery, gloves become perforated in approximately 11% of procedures, and the wearer recognizes that a perforation has occurred in only 17% of those cases.
T
Double-gloving reduces perforations of the innermost glove nine-fold compared with single surgical gloves.
T
Double-gloving with special darkly-colored “indicator” undergloves (Biogel®, Mölnlycke Health Care, Norcross, GA) can further facilitate rapid identification of punctures.
Many Mohs surgeons no longer use sterile gloves for the acquisition of layers and a growing number eschew them for the final reconstruction. Three studies provide evidentiary support for these practices.
T
The first was a retrospective study in 2006, which compared infection rates between two Mohs surgeons in the same practice, one of whom used clean gloves and the other sterile for Mohs layers. Both used sterile gloves for reconstructions. 17 Their infection rates were statistically similar (1.8% vs 1.7%, respectively). A 2010 prospective, but uncontrolled, study reported an SSI rate of 0.91% when using clean gloves for all steps of Mohs surgery, including reconstruction. 18 Similarly, a randomized controlled trial of 60 patients that compared clean versus sterile gloves for all aspects of Mohs surgery showed SSI rate equivalency. 19 However, this pilot study was underpowered and cannot support definitive conclusions. Given the low baseline SSI rate, a properly powered study would require at least 1000 patients depending on one’s assumptions. A prospective randomized study of that magnitude is needed to substantiate consensus evidence-based recommendations for the exclusive use of clean gloves.
Patients in street clothes disperse the same amount of bacteria as those dressed in a clean cotton gown, covered with a cotton sheet.
T
Infection rates for same-day surgery are not significantly affected when patients remain fully dressed. Aside from causing embarrassment, removal of underwear and putting on a minimally secured gown allows for increased bacterial shedding from the perineum into the environment. Therefore, unless a gown facilitates exposure of the surgical site, or body fluid spillage is expected, the scientific literature does not support the need for patients to remove their street clothes before dermatologic surgery.
Shaving with a razor in particular should be avoided, because it causes abrasions which compromise skin integrity and allow bacteria to flourish.
T
The time lapse between shaving and surgery plays a key role in the risk for infection. Seropian and Reynolds found a wound infection rate of 3.1% in patients shaved immediately before surgery that was significantly higher than the rate of 0.6% that occurred in those who were not shaved.
T
The time lapse between shaving and surgery plays a key role in the risk for infection. This infection rate rose to 7.1% when shaving was done the day before surgery, and to as much as 20% when performed more than 24 h before surgery.
T
From an infection standpoint, it is generally agreed that hair should be left intact within the surgical field.
T
If these methods do not prove sufficient, and removal is required, the hair should be judiciously clipped at the skin with a pair of scissors or electric clippers before establishing a sterile field.
Frustration of attempting to suture on the scalp when hair is caught with each throw of the knot is well known to surgeons who work in this area. If care is not taken, the entangled hair can decrease knot security and increase the risk of a foreign-body reaction
Secure the hair away from the field with sterile hair clips, rubber bands, or a water-soluble gel, such as E-Z Lubricating Jelly (Chester Labs, Cincinnati, OH). This sterile lubricant is also a useful replacement for mineral oil when harvesting grafts with a dermatome. Petrolatum-based ointments can be difficult to cleanse from the hair and are generally not recommended.
T
On the night before surgery, a preoperative shower with CHG or PI has been shown to decrease bacterial colonization and wound infection rates, particularly those from S. aureus , in some studies.A large meta-analysis and a Cochrane review, however, concluded that current evidence does not support this as routine practice. It may be considered for procedures with large surgical fields such as liposuction or for surgical sites with increased risk for infection, like on the lower extremity.
T
CHG and alcohol-containing preparations should be avoided in the periocular area, as they may cause corneal and conjunctival irritation.
T
ocular CHG exposure has caused severe keratitis even leading to blindness.
T
If there is accidental conjunctival exposure to CHG, immediate and copious flushing of the eye is recommended until the patient reports no more pain or irritation.
T
PI solution at half strength (5%) is a safe and effective alternative preparation to use in the eye area. If the surgical site is near the eye but will not involve the lids themselves, then prepping the eyelids can be omitted and the eye covered with a sterile eye pad or gauze
T
Widely accepted as safe and effective for disinfection of the conjunctiva; commonly diluted to 5% with saline to reduce potential for irritation
5% povidone iodine is approved for ophthalmic use
T
Iodine povacrylex and 74% isopropyl alcohol is a moderate eye irritant due to alcohol
T
3% chloroxylenol and 3% cocamidopropyl PG-dimonium chloride phosphate is safe and effective for mucous membranes and around ears and eyes
T
Tightly woven cotton surgical drapes are softer and arguably more comfortable for patients than disposable impermeable drapes, but they may absorb fluid during surgery and “wick” bacteria into the sterile field
T
To limit the risk for contamination, woven drapes should be chemically treated to retard water, inspected frequently for wear, and changed immediately if they should become wet.
T
Alternatives to woven drapes are disposable plastic and plastic-lined paper drapes, which are impermeable to moisture and bacteria. The drawback is that they may be stiff and have a tendency to shift during surgery.
To limit potential contamination, doors should be kept closed, the passage of non-essential personnel should be minimized, and cleaning and disinfection of surgical rooms should be performed on a scheduled basis with a quaternary ammonium sanitizer.
T
Microorganisms from both the patient and surgical personnel are continually shed into the operating room environment via desquamated skin cells. Once dispersed, they eventually settle onto horizontal surfaces such as the surgical field, floor, or counter tops. This reservoir can be re-aerosolized from the passage of feet across the floor and by the breeze generated from opening the surgical room door
Most guidelines recommend visible inspection of the room in between procedures, and prompt clean-up of any visible soiling or discarded surgical items that may have fallen onto the floor. A thorough terminal cleaning is recommended at the end of each day of use.
T
the goal of preoperative skin cleansing is to decrease resident flora to its lowest possible level, with the realization that it cannot be completely eradicated
T
The most common resident organisms are the coagulase-negative staphylococci, with Staphylococcus epidermidis accounting for more than 90% of resident aerobes. 4 Anaerobic diphtheroids such as Propionibacterium acnes are common in lipid-rich locations, such as the pilosebaceous unit. Gram-negative bacteria represent a small portion of the resident flora. They are mostly limited to the humid intertriginous areas with Enterobacter , Klebsiella , Escherichia coli , and Proteus spp. being the predominant organisms
T