Key question / focus
How can we explain behavior without reference to inner mental states?
How “truth” / scientific knowledge is framed
Scientific knowledge focuses on observable regularities of behavior (stimulus → response)
Key principle(s) / mechanism
Stimulus–response patterns; behavior as automatic, reactive, reflexive
Opposing thinking (typical critique)
Cognitive/interpretive critique: ignores meanings, intentions, norms; reduces social action to observable responses
How it explains “not sitting down in a waiting room”
You don’t sit because cues in the environment function as stimuli that trigger a learned response (“stand”). Reinforcement history matters (approval vs. disapproval)
Example scenario
You approach a chair; you see a “Keep distance” sign + others standing → you automatically stand. If past standing earned approval (or avoided reprimand), the response is reinforced