Key question / focus
How are facts made in practice?
How “truth” / scientific knowledge is framed
Scientific knowing as “situated material-semiotic practices”; facts as socio-technical achievements; warns against simplistic “just constructed” views
Key principle(s) / mechanism
Focus on practices, technologies, interests, discourse; socio-technical achievement (robust fit of world–theory–apparatus)
Opposing thinking (typical critique from others)
Critique from rationalists: risks sliding into relativism; from institutional/normative views: underplays formal norms and the aspiration to objectivity
How it explains “not sitting down in a waiting room”
You don’t sit because the “waiting room order” is performed/produced in practice: chairs, spacing, signage, phone-use, hygiene routines, and mutual monitoring enact what “waiting properly” is. Your body becomes part of that ordering
Example scenario
Chairs are arranged in a way that makes sitting feel like “claiming territory.” People stand with coats/bags marking boundaries. The room’s material setup + people’s micro-actions produce the norm that standing is safer/politer
Named anchors in slides
Constructivist figures shown (Knorr, Collins, Latour, Traweek) and broader STS sensibility (course materials)