What are the two questions to ask to prove consent?
R v Slingsby
Consent can be used as a defence for common assault
Pretty v UK
Consent is never a defence to murder
R v Leach
Consent can never be used as a defence to a crime under s18
R v Brown and Others
Consent CANNOT GENERALLY be used as a defence to a s20 charge
exceptions to general rule in s20 and s47
-properly conducted games and sports
-rough horseplay
-medical treatment
Rough horseplay case example
Aitken
personal adornment case example
Wilson
R v Olugboja
Submission is not consent
What 3 things must be considered, to see if V actually consented?
-consent must be genuine
-consent can be implied
Gillick
A person has capacity to consent, if they are Gillick Competent
V must have sufficient maturity, intelligence, and understanding of the nature and consequences of what they are consenting to.
R v Newland
ingenuine consent
What is implied consent?
Consent you give by being in a certain area/ doing a certain thing. e.g sport.