Misrepresentation Flashcards

(25 cards)

1
Q

Spice Girls v Aprilia

A

Making a statement can include words, pictures, advertising
and conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A

Merely indicting that a contract cannot be completed, rather than making a threat with a demand, is not illegitimate pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fletcher v Krell

A

Silence or non-disclosure is usually NOT making a statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tate v Williamson

A

Where the parties have a relationship of utmost confidence/trust, withholding information is making a false
statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimmock v Hallet

A

Telling a half-truth (technically true but not fully accurate) is making a false statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

With v O’Flanagan

A

Where there had been a change of circumstances since the
first statement, not updating the other party is making a false
statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CRA 2015

A

In B2C contracts, leaving out any details that allow a buyer to
make an informed decision is still making a false statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bisset v Wilkinson

A

Statements of opinion are NOT statements of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Smith v LHP

A

Special knowledge of a situation may make an opinion a statement of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Edgington v Fitzmaurice

A

A statement of future intent will only be a fact if the representor
was lying about their intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dimmock v Hallet

A

Mere puff (something a reasonable person wouldn’t take seriously) is not a statement of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball

A

Sales talk that a reasonable person would take seriously will be
considered a statement of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Horsefall v Thomas

A

If the false statement made no difference to V’s decision to
contract, the statement did not induce them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attwood v Small

A

If the false statement did not convince V to enter the contract, the statement did not induce them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Redgrave v Hurd

A

If the false statement convinced V to enter the contract, V was
induced even if they did not take reasonable steps to check the
statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 (innocent rep)

A

An innocent misrepresentation is where D believed the statement was true and had reasonable grounds to believe this.

17
Q

S2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 (negligent misrep)

A

A negligent misrepresentation is where D believed the statement was true but did NOT have reasonable grounds to believe this.

18
Q

Derry v Peek

A

A fraudulent misrepresentation is where D knows their statement is false.

19
Q

Vigers v Pike

A

Where it is impossible to return the parties to their original position, this will be a bar to rescission.

20
Q

Long v Lloyd

A

Where the parties have agreed to continue with the contract
after discovering the mistake, the contract has been affirmed
and this is a bar to rescission.

21
Q

Leaf v IG

A

Where there is a long delay between the false statement and suing, there is a bar to rescission.
Note: the delay for fraudulent misrep only starts once the lie is
discovered, whereas the other 2 types start when the lie is first
told.

22
Q

S2(2) Misrepresentation Act 1967

A

Damages for innocent misrep can only be gained as a substitute
for rescission (so if rescission is barred, V can’t get any damages).

The damages would only cover actual losses up to the trial.

23
Q

Lewis v Avery

A

Where the property has been given to an innocent third party,
this will be a bar to rescission.

24
Q

S2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 (negligent misrep remedies)

A

Damages for negligent misrep can only be gained as a substitute
for rescission (so if rescission is barred, V can’t get any damages).

The damages can cover actual losses up to the trial AND future
loss too.

25
East v Maurer
Damages for fraudulent misrep can be gained in addition to rescission (so V can get damages even if rescission is barred). The damages can cover actual losses up to the trial AND future loss too.