S8 Theft Act 1968
Robbery is using or threatening force before, or at the time of the stealing
Robinson
If an element of theft is missing, then there can be no robbery
R v Dawson and James
Even a small/ slight touch can amount to force. It is a question of fact for the jury to decide
RP and others v DPP
merely taking something will not amount to ‘force’ automatically. E.g. taking a cigarette out of a person’s fingers
R v Clouden
Indirect force
S.8
D must seek to put V in fear of being then and there subjected to force
B and R v DPP (links to S.8)
It is not the victim’s reaction that matters, it is the intention of the perpetrator
Smith v Desmond
D doesn’t have to use or threaten force on the victim of the theft
R v Hale
Theft/ appropriation can be a continuing act, in which case, any force used/ threatened during the theft will be ‘at the time of the theft’
R v Lockley
Force in order to escape after stealing is still force used to steal