what do employers really care about?
our ability to work in teams
–> skill they care the most about whe hiring uni graduates
what is some evidence towards the importance of team work?
Wuchty et al
meta analysis found that teams produced more highly cited and more impactful work than individuals
–> # of authors in papers has grown
what are 2 main advantages of group decision-making?
what is an example of being able to check others errors?
in 2 exams, where 1 was individual and the other was in teams, averages increased from 71% to 92%
–> HOWEVER THIS WASN’T THE CASE FOR EVERYONE
in which 2 cases do groups work really well?
intellective tasks
tasks that have right answers
–> great for group work assuming someone actually knows the answer
judgmental tasks
there isn’t a right or wrong answer
–> groups tend to struggle more
what is the issue around listening to the group member who knows the most?
in which situation do groups not work well?
Laron 1998
Asked physicians to get in groups of 3 to diagnose hypothetical medical cases
Some information was given to all of them and some information was individual
They found that shared info was disproportionately discussed more than unshared info
what is group polarization
the process of members’ initial shared beliefs becoming more extreme or polarized due to group interaction
what are some IRL impacts of group polarization?
Modern media has become extremely polarized
–> Conservative and liberal social media have formed their groups
–> This leads to them having different social media feeds due to algorithms
–> This leads to more and more polarization in both liberals and conservatives
is group polarization always bad?
no, if the group’s cause is positive (ie, fighting climate change), it can be okay
–> but it can often lead to divided societies
3 conclus about group decision making
are crowds or individuals smarter?
crowds, can revise answers and share info
Sigman TEd Talk experiment
what happened in the ted talk experiment when questions became harder, ie moral dilemas
people tended to reach consensus even if initially they were on completely opposing sides of the spectrum
what did the ted talk experiment find about confidence?
what did they find with high-confidence middle raters?
groups that had them were more likely to reach a consensus
what appears to be the way that people reach a consensus?
robust average
= statistically smart strategy. ignore extreme or obviously wrong answers to make an actual average
–> less weight to outliers
do we use robust averages consciously?
no, it appears to be automatic and spontaneous
what are 2 factors that affect good collective decisions?
what are some critiques of democracy?
ensures diversity (good) but doesn’t foster thoughtful debates
what could be a better alternative than democracy?
forming small groups that converge into a single decision while still maintaining diversity of opinions bc of the many groups