Prosocial Behaviour Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

what is one of the exemplary cases that we mention when talking about bystander effect?

A

Kitty Genovese
- killed outside her apartment
- witnessed by 38 ppl but no one helped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

latane and darley 1968

A

Smoky room study
An experimental room slowly filled with smoke
Either with 1 person or with 3 people
In the 1 person condition, 75% of people came out for help within 6 minutes
Whereas in the 3 person condition, 38% came out for help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the bystander effect?

A

More people witnessing an emergency leads to a lower % of help and a longer delay for the help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is an important aspect of bystander effect?

A

that we can see how other people react

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in bystander effect…
what happens when we can see people?
what happens when we cant see people?

A
  • pluralistic ignorance
  • diffusion of responsability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is pluralistic ignorance?

A

people conforming to what they (wrongly) believe to be others’ unconcerned reactions in ambigious situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happens under pluralistic ignorance?
(connect to norms)

A

everyone assumes that other people are unconcerned due to blank expressions so they don’t react either
–> follow a norm that doesn’t actually exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

diffusion of responsibility

A

assuming someone else will take care of the problem
–> Kitty G case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who developed the bystander intervention decision tree? what is it?

A

latane and darley, 1973
–> framework for whether/how people will provide help in an emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 key steps in the bystander intervention decision tree

A
  1. notice that something is going on
  2. interpret that event as an emergency
  3. assume personal responsibility
  4. know what to do
  5. decide to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

step 1: notice that something is going on

A
  • pick up on subtle factors that dictate whether we consider the situation to be urgent
  • being rushed or in a hurry can make you less likely to notice an emergency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

step 2: interpret that event as an emergency

A
  • here is where ambiguity of the situation plays a big role
  • urgency might get lost if there are a lot of bystanders due to pluralistic ignorance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

step 3: assume personal responsibility

A
  • here is where diffusion of responsability kicks in
  • the more bystanders, the less likely we’re going to assume responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

step 4: know what to do

A
  • evaluating whether you have the necessary expertise
  • but can be as simple as calling 911
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

step 5: decide to help

A
  • weigh the costs and benefits
  • decide if helping is the best response
  • can we actually help? is it our responsibility?
    –> here is where fear of embarrassment comes in :(
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

practical application

A

if you’ve already decided to help and are currently doing so but need another person,
–> IDENTIFY that need in a clear way
–> IDENTIFY a specific helper
to cut through the diffusion of responsibility principle
–> give specific instructions

17
Q

who conducted the good Samaritan study?

A

darley and batson in 1973

18
Q

how did darley and batson present an ambigious situation?

A

showed a man slumped in a doorway

18
Q

procedure good Samaritan study

A

Recruited seminary students ie very prosocial people
Asked half to deliver a parable on the good samaritan, the bible story about the importance of helping strangers
And manipulated how much of a hurry the participants were in to get to the other building (Low “It’ll be a few mins” // Med “The assistant is ready, go over” // High “they were expecting you a couple of minutes ago, hurry”)

19
Q

what were the results of the good samaritan study?

A

Found that when people weren’t in a rush, about 60% of people stopped to help
But when they were in the med condition, this dropped to about 45%
And dropped down to 10% of people helping when they were very rushed
Even tho they were literally giving lectures on helping strangers