what is one of the exemplary cases that we mention when talking about bystander effect?
Kitty Genovese
- killed outside her apartment
- witnessed by 38 ppl but no one helped
latane and darley 1968
Smoky room study
An experimental room slowly filled with smoke
Either with 1 person or with 3 people
In the 1 person condition, 75% of people came out for help within 6 minutes
Whereas in the 3 person condition, 38% came out for help
what is the bystander effect?
More people witnessing an emergency leads to a lower % of help and a longer delay for the help
what is an important aspect of bystander effect?
that we can see how other people react
in bystander effect…
what happens when we can see people?
what happens when we cant see people?
what is pluralistic ignorance?
people conforming to what they (wrongly) believe to be others’ unconcerned reactions in ambigious situations
what happens under pluralistic ignorance?
(connect to norms)
everyone assumes that other people are unconcerned due to blank expressions so they don’t react either
–> follow a norm that doesn’t actually exist
diffusion of responsibility
assuming someone else will take care of the problem
–> Kitty G case
who developed the bystander intervention decision tree? what is it?
latane and darley, 1973
–> framework for whether/how people will provide help in an emergency
5 key steps in the bystander intervention decision tree
step 1: notice that something is going on
step 2: interpret that event as an emergency
step 3: assume personal responsibility
step 4: know what to do
step 5: decide to help
practical application
if you’ve already decided to help and are currently doing so but need another person,
–> IDENTIFY that need in a clear way
–> IDENTIFY a specific helper
to cut through the diffusion of responsibility principle
–> give specific instructions
who conducted the good Samaritan study?
darley and batson in 1973
how did darley and batson present an ambigious situation?
showed a man slumped in a doorway
procedure good Samaritan study
Recruited seminary students ie very prosocial people
Asked half to deliver a parable on the good samaritan, the bible story about the importance of helping strangers
And manipulated how much of a hurry the participants were in to get to the other building (Low “It’ll be a few mins” // Med “The assistant is ready, go over” // High “they were expecting you a couple of minutes ago, hurry”)
what were the results of the good samaritan study?
Found that when people weren’t in a rush, about 60% of people stopped to help
But when they were in the med condition, this dropped to about 45%
And dropped down to 10% of people helping when they were very rushed
Even tho they were literally giving lectures on helping strangers