what is capacity?
The amount of information that can be held at any one time/ in a memory store;
what is duration?
the length of time that memory store holds at any time;
what is coding?
The format in which information is stored in the various memory stores.;
Label the multi-store model of memory,
what is the sensory register?
the memory stores for each of our 5 senses;
what are the 2 main parts of sensory register/ memory?
iconic store - visual info - images echoic store - auditory info - sounds;
what is the capacity, duration and coding of sensory memory?
cap: very large dur: limited cod: unprocessed;
what is the capacity, duration and coding of short term memory?
cap: 7+/-2 items dur: 18 - 30s cod: acoustic;
what is the capacity, duration and coding of long term memory?
cap: unlimited dur: lifetime cod: semantic (meaning);
what are the key claims of the MSM?
what study focuses on capacity and duration?
Sperling (1960) - Participants flashed with 3x4 grid of letters on screen for 50ms then asked to recall as many letters as they could remember - when asked to recall as many letters, they could only remember 4 when asked to recall a single row, they recalled 3 - capacity of SR is min 4 items + duration is between 250 to 500ms ( 1/2 or 1/4 of a second) + high control: lab experiment, standardised instructions, high internal validity - low ecological validity: not real life situation, difficult to generalise to how it works IRL, low external validity;
what study was focused on capacity in STM?
Miller (1956) - digit span technique; participants hearing a list of numbers and immediately try recall them in correct order - span of STM is 7+/-2 digits, found that if people chunk informations together, they can remember more = cap of stm is 7+/-2 items + lab experiment = high control, control of EV variables, gives validity - individual diff of memory;
What study was duration of STM?
Peterson and Peterson (1959) - 24 undergrad students presented with constant trigram, then told to count back from a given number in intervals of 3 (maintenance rehearsal blocked), then asked to recall the trigram - after 3s delay, 80% recall after 18s delay, 10% recall after 30s, no recall = durations of STM is 30s if maintenance rehearsal is blocked + lab experiment - high control over EV, high internal validity - low ecological validity - artificial task, doesn’t rep real life so can generalise to RL;
what study focused on duration in LTM?
Bahrick et al (1975) - graduates from high school in american over 50 year period split into 2 groups 1. photo recognition group: given list of names and asked to match with person in photo 2. recall group: P asked to name people without being given a list of possible names - 1. Photo recognition - 15 Years - 90% correct 48 Years - 70% correct 2. Recall group - 15 Years - 60% correct 48 years - 30% correct Conc: duration of LTM can last a lifetime (atleast 48 years) + high ecological validity - uses meaningful stimulus material (High school), real life evidence to suggest duration of LTM is lifelong - low control over EV - participants couldve met up recently with old classmates when they left;
what study focused on coding in STM and LTM?
Baddeley (1996) - 4 different conditions, semantically similar/dissimilar and acoustically similar/dissimilar, STM they can to recall the 10 words immediately in correct order, LTM they had to recall 10 words after 20 mins - LTM recall worse for semantically similar, STM recall worse for acoustically similar conc: coding in LTM is mainly semantic, coding in STM is acoustic + lab experiment, high control over EV, high internal validity - low ecological validity, artificial task - pop validity - only on british housewives;
what study was the primacy/recency effect used as research to support the MSM?
Glanzer and Cunitz participants heard a long list of 30 words and then has to recall them in any order participants best recall was for first items (primacy effect) and last terms (recency effect) conc: primacy effect occurs bc p able to rehearse first few items on list and store in LTM, recency effect bc they’re still fresh in STM, therefore LTM and STM in different stores + claims STM and LTM are separate supported by research - primacy effect occurs bc p able to rehearse first few items on list and store in LTM, recency effect bc they’re still fresh in STM, therefore LTM and STM in different stores - flashbulb memory- overemphasised role of rehearsal;
outline and evaluate the MSM model of memory,
outline: Info reaches our senses from environment and enters our memory systems through sensory memory;;
what components are in the Working memory model?
central executive, phonological loop, episodic buffer, visuo-spatial sketchpad;
describe central executive,
coordinates info to slave systems, involved with strategic planning cap: limited cod: modal free;
describe phonological loop,
Deals with spoken and written material - responsible for verbal information - Phonological Store (inner ear) - Linked to speech perception - holds words you hear (i.e. spoken words) - Articulatory loop (inner voice) - Linked to speech production. Used to rehearse and store verbal information from the phonological store - maintenance rehearsal cap: limited, coding: acoustic;
describe episodic buffer,
integrates info to LTM, backup store that allows for dual coding ( processing 2 pieces of information simultaneously (usually visual + auditory));
describe the visuo-spatial sketchpad,
responsible for visual information - visuo cache (inner eye): Stores and processes information in a visual - colours - inner scribe allows for processing spatial awareness navigation;
3 key assumptions of the WMM?
an example of task completed by phonological loop,
talking/listening to music;