The type of NHST will depend on…
Number of variables: levels of IVs and DV
Nature of variables: continuous or categorical
Hypotheses being investigated
Type of experimental design
One tailed or two tailed hypothesis
Parametric test
Makes assumptions about the population distribution:
The sample IS normally distributed there is no significant skew
Homogeneity of variances: we don’t want major imbalances in sample as a result of participant characteristics so THERE IS EQUAL VARIANCE ACROSS GROUPS
If the DV is interval/ratio level of data
If observations are independent of each other, not influenced by other values in data
Non-parametric tests
Do not make assumptions about the population distribution
The sample is not normally distributed Such as if there is significant skew in the data (with a small sample)
if does not reach criteria for parametric:
No homogeneity of variances
Not interval/ratio level data
No independent observations
How to check normality of curve
Visually: histograms
Statistically: using z values
Checking homogeneity of variance across groups
Assumes roughly equal variaance across groups/ experimental conditions
RUN A LEVENE’S TEST
Levene’s test
Checking variances of two samples are approximately equal
When p> .05 the homogeneity of variances can be assumed
Welch’s t test
If p< .05 then we violate the variances of samples being approximately equal and they are not due to chance
So we use this test
List of null hypothesis test
Independent samples t-test
Paired t test
Wilcoxon signed ranks test
Mann Whitney U test
Chi squared test
Spearman’s rho test
Pearson’s r test
Independent samples t-test
One IV at 2 levels
Independent groups (between subjects)
Ratio data
Do we accept the null hypothesis?
No, we say we ‘failed to reject’ instead
** if we do reject we say reject
if p= .051 when a=.05
We say non significant
Do we say insignificant?
No
we ‘ fail to reject the null hypothesis’
Writing up results
State in the results section
Unpack in the discussion section
Errors
Type 1
Type 2
Type 1 error
When we reject the null hypothesis when we shouldn’t have
Because the truth (unknown) is that the null hypothesis is true
Type 1 error symbol
a = probability of making a type 1 error
alpha
Type 2 error
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis (accept it but dont say that) when we shouldn’t have
Because the truth is that the null hypothesis is false
Correct decisions of null hypothesis
The null hypothesis is true in reality:
And we fail to reject it (accept it)
So 1-a (error made when we falsely reject it)
The null hypothesis is false in reality:
And we reject it
So 1-b (error made when we falsely fail to reject it)
Type 2 error symbol
B beta
Probability of making a type 2 error
Alpha
The odds of saying there is a relationship when there is not one
Aka false positive
Beta
Odds of saying no relationship if we assume there is one
Aka false negative/ rejection
When choosing statistical tests in terms of error types
Balance possible errors based on what we are measuring eg cancer screening? false positives stay on safe side
Reduce risk of errors
Define parameters before study e.g. set alpha and betas= long-run error control
Limit number of hypothesis and statistical significance test (familywise error)
Use bonferroni correction
Replicate results across different studies
Familywise error
More statistical tests done, more likely for an error