Physical Science
Branch of natural sciences that study the non living world
Social Science
Studies culture, society and human interaction
What differentiates social and physical science?
Physical - Study of non living world produces unvaried universal laws that can be directly measured, precisely and objectively
Social - Study of human interaction does not produce unvaried universal laws
How did psychology adopt the scientific method?
Wilhelm Wundt established first psychological testing lab on basis of observation, experimentation and measurement
Like physical sciences, can lead to universal laws
Do all philosophers of science agree on what the scientific method is?
NO
3 Accounts of the scientific method
Karl Popper
Thomas Khun
Paul Feyerabend
Unifying principles of the scientific method
A COLLECTION of different methods - the empirical method and the hypothetio-deductive method
with Epistemic thinking (abt the obtainment of knowledge)
Pragmatism
Obtaining information that can be practically applied to improve peoples lives
Different stages of understanding
Exploration –> Experimentation —-> Testing
Why is scientific method a collection of methods and not a single straight checklist?
Method used will vary for each context (eg what is being measured, and what the aim is (to obtain theoretical information or usefulness) and what level of understanding we are at with the topic
2 methods the scientific method is composed of typically
Empirical method
Hypothetico deductive method
Empirical
Through observation or experience
The empirical method
Gathering data with no preconceptions on what the result should look like
Then organising this to find trends/ relationships
That we can use to make predictions (INDUCTIVE references)
KEY: understand why the predictions are right so they can be transferred to the unobserved
Induction
Predictions/Drawing general patterns based off of trends in data that we can make (without having a theory or preconceptions first)
To draw conclusions to the unobserved
The hypothetico-deductive method
Pre existing Theories are evaluated by generating then testing hypotheses: develop a ‘law’ through observation and induction (empirical method)
Then explanatory theory
Dduction of hypothesis: if this theory is right then logically this should occur
Test hypothesis and results either challenge or support the theory
Falsification
Theories must be worded so they have the ability to be refuted aka describe what supports the theory and what discredits it
Why is falsification a key in hypothetico-deductive method?
Because coinciding theories exist that need to be scrutinised to find which has the most evidence to support it
So all scientific theories must have this ability to be scrutinised: have evidence to support/contradict
Why is falsification better than verification?
Allows for the development of theories to be more accurate and supported by evidence (while theories can be discareded if enough evidence against)
Do we ever prove in science?
No just be really really certain
Problems with falsification
There are other goals of science eg improve the world
Science deals with probabilities and so it may not havw the ability to be proven wrong
Being proved wrong leads to modification of theory until it is no longer the same theory ??
Epistemic virtues
Objectivity
Open mindedness to possibility were wrong
Skepticism
Systematicity
Thoroughness
Transparency and honesty
Replicability
Demonstrates same support for a theory by repeating a similar test under different study conditions
Definition of findings
Observed occurrances in a study before any interpretations are made
Definition of conclusions
Explanations/interpretations of the findings in light of a background theory