BACKGROUND
Change blindness?
Inattentive blindness?
AIM?
To build on previous research & investigate factors that may affect visual detection rates.
- Visual similarity of the unexpected object & attended ones
- Task difficulty
- The superimposed version of the display versus the live version
- The nature of the unusual event
SAMPLE?
228 Participants (observers).
SAMPLING METHOD?
Self-selective volunteer.
- without compensation
- candy bar
- single fee
RESEARCH METHOD?
DESIGN?
Lab experiment
Independent measures
IV? (4)
What were the 4 task conditions?
DV?
The number of participants in each of the 16 conditions who noticed the unexpected event (umbrella woman/gorilla)
PROCEDURE?
RESULTS?
54% noticed the unexpected event & 46% failed to notice the unexpected event.
- More participants noticed the unexpected event in the opaque/easy condition than transparent/hard.
CONCLUSIONS? (2)