Week 11 Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

how many variants of PPA

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the variants of PPA

A

1) Nonfluent/agrammatic - nfvPPA
2) Fluent (semantic) - svPPA
3) Logopenic - lvPPA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is PCA (Posterior Cortical Atrophy)

A

dementia that begins from visual symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PPA variant can be diagnosed only after the following are established:

(4 required + 3 must nots)

A

1) insidious onset, gradual progression
2) language impairment is most salient feature
3) language difficulty is cause of impaired ADLs
4) aphasia is the most prominent feature at onset

But must not:
- must not be better explained by neurodegen, psych, medical disorders
- must not have initial impairments in episodic & visual memory, or visuo-perceptual impairments
- must not have prominent initial behavioural disturbances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

which two variants of PPA are types of fronto-temporal dementia?

A

fluent and non-fluent variants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

where is the nonfluent/agrammatic variant lesion?

A

unilateral, inferior frontal part of dominant hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cause of nonfluent/agrammatic variant?

A

sporadic, familial, or hereditary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

characteristics of nonfluent/agrammatic variant?

A

at least one: agrammatism or AOS
at least two: impaired complex syntax, spared comprehension of single words, spared object knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

t or f: nonfluent/agrammatic variant is similar to Wernicke’s

A

false; similar to Broca’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

t or f: people with nonfluent/agrammatic variant have spared semantic knowledge

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain the cause for errors in the semantic (fluent) variant? (think processing models)

A

phonology needs to meet semantics but it cannot meet the semantic network; there is an access problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

where is the semantic (fluent) variant lesion?

A

anterior temporal lobe bilaterally
right hemisphere houses understanding & recognition
left hemisphere usually has worse damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

characteristics of semantic (fluent) variant?

A

both: impaired confrontation naming and comprehension of single words
at least 3: impaired object knowledge, surface dyslexia or dysgraphia, spared repetition, spared syntax and motor speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the loss of semantic features in the semantic (fluent) variant in a picture drawing task

A

animals might be missing characteristic components (4 legs, wings, beak)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the most salient feature of logopenic variant?

A

anomia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

where is the logopenic variant lesion?

A

(L) unilateral posterior temporal region, inferior parietal lobule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the lesion of the logopenic variant is similar to that of ________

A

Alzheimer’s disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

characteristics of logopenic variant?

A

both: impaired single word retrieval (naming & convo), impaired repetition of sentences
at least 3: phonological errors on naming and in convo, spared single-word comprehension and obj knowledge, spared motor speech, absence of agrammatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how to differ logopenic variant from nonfluent/agrammatic variant?

A

motor speech
spared in logopenic
impaired in nonfluent/agrammatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the hardest linguistic component for each variant?

A

logopenic: working memory
nonfluent/agrammatic: phonology & syntax
semantic (fluent): semantics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is the mini linguistics state examination (MLSE)?

A

an ax tool that focuses acutely on language domains to help clinicians assess and classify primary progressive aphasia

22
Q

PPA that has progressed is called _____

23
Q

compare early stages nonfluent/agrammatic PPA to late stages

A

early: grammar or motor speech deficit
late: problems with executive function, swallowing, motor function, other diseases

24
Q

compare early stages semantic (fluent) PPA to late stages

A

early: single word comprehension deficit
late: change in behaviour/personality & deficits in recognizing faces and objects

25
compare early stages logopenic PPA to late stages
early: word-finding and oral repetition difficulties late: problems with WM and/or general memory, possible DAT
26
language intervention approaches for PPA
lexical retrieval (phonemic/semantic feature analysis, spaced retreival, errorless learning) work on syntax (mapping therapy) --> for nonfluent PPA
27
speech intervention approaches for PPA
Apraxia therapy/fluency: script training --> nfPPA
28
group intervention approaches for PPA
Baycrest hybrid model: individual tx + group + caregiver support + counselling + education Aphasia Institute: supported conversation
29
adjuvant therapies
using additional treatments alongside SLP tx to improve outcomes for PPA e.g., tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) + lexical retrieval
30
computerized approaches for PPA
Internet-based programs (wordfinding.ca) Apps (TACTUS, Constant Therapy. Etc)
31
t or f: people w PPA can relearn?
true
32
Reginas research on picture naming tx for PPA showed (3):
1) improvement after tx 2) effects maintained 6 months later 3) slower forgetting of treated words
33
factors affecting success in therapy:
1) Personal familiarity with items 2) Organizing words in semantic categories is more helpful than alphabetical 3) Partially spared semantic knowledge facilitates re-learning
34
how does errorless learning work on computer software?
have client name object only if they are 100% certain with the response. if uncertain, they are prompted to listen to a description, then read the written word
35
t or f: repeating words improves the synergy of repeating that word
true
36
t or f: patients w dementia aren't good candidates for computer training programs
false
37
t or f: computer approaches showed improvement up to 3 months post training
true
38
t or f: errorless re-learning of words helped with all naming retention immediately post-tx
false; only with treated words
39
errorful v errorless learning
Errorful learning involves making and correcting mistakes, while errorless learning aims to prevent mistakes from the start in errorless learning, the client should only name the item if 100% sure
40
effortless v effortful learning
effortless: passive effortful: active
41
effortful errorful learning cues
asking open-ended questions, asking them to repeat the obj name
42
effortful errorless learning cues
asking y/n questions where the answer is always yes, asking them to repeat the obj name
43
effortless errorful learning cues
describing what the object is *not*, asking them to repeat the obj name (not a giraffe, does not start with l)
44
effortless errorless learning cues
describing the object, asking them to repeat the obj name
45
rank the most helpful to least helpful types of learning
errorless active, errorless passive, errorful active, errorful passive
46
t or f: semantic judgement tasks can increase brain activation post-treatment
true; other areas of the brain are compensating for the lost skill
47
t or f: types of effortful/effortless errorful/errorless learning cues have a positive effect on word comprehension
false; no effect
48
why is language tx beneficial in PPA?
- post-tx improvement - focused activity (active) - could relearn words for daily functioning - could generalize to different items/contexts - could maintain gains with practice - neuroplasticity - to prolong the ability to use words/speak as long as possible - to improve QoL
49
Goals of PPA group intervention
1) education on PPA 2) communication opportunities for people with PPA 3) teach communication strategies 4) discuss ideas, practicing strategies, sharing experiences
50
Structure of group intervention for PPA
10 weeks 2 hour sessions: - first hour: work together on language while spouses mingle with SLP, SW - second hour: spouses join group members for educational sessions or communication strategy sessions