WEEK 7: LECTURE Flashcards

(53 cards)

1
Q

staffing decisions

A

Decisions associated with recruiting,
selecting, promoting, and separating employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

staffing process steps

A
  1. It begins with a job or need analysis to identify desired
    candidate characteristics.
  2. This information is used to guide the selection process.
  3. Candidates are gradually narrowed down through
    rejection decisions until a selection is made.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

high-performance work practices

A

Practices that include the
use of formal job analyses, selection from within for key positions,
merit-based promotions, & the use of formal assessment devices
for selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

multinational staffing

A

procedures
that involve staffing for
organizations in more than one
country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when can conflict arise in multinational staffing?

A

when cultures
come together that have different
perspectives on staffing processes
& decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

validity

A

The accurateness of inferences made based
on test or performance data; also addresses whether a
measure is accurate & completely represents what was
intended to be measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

criterion-related validity

A

How well does a measure
predict some outcome of interest?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

true positive

A

Applicant is
accepted &
performed well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

true negative

A

Applicant is
rejected & would
have performed
poorly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

false positive

A

Applicant is
accepted but
performed poorly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

false negative

A

Applicant is
rejected but would
have performed
well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cut score

A

Specified point in a
distribution of scores below
which candidates are rejected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

criterion-referenced cut scores

A

Score established by
considering the desired level of performance for a new hire &
finding the test score that corresponds to the desired level of
performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

norm-referenced cut scores

A

Score based on some index of
the test taker’s scores rather than any notion of job
performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

utility analysis

A

a technique that assesses the
economic return on investment of human resource
interventions such as staffing and training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

economic utility

A

a valuable
concept for assessing staffing strategy effectiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

foundation of utility analysis

A
  1. baserate
  2. selection ratio
  3. validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

baserate

A

% of applicants who would be successful on the
job if all of them were hired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

selection ratio

A

Proportion of job applicants an organization
must hire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

validity

A

Magnitude of the correlation between predictor
and criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

comprehensive staffing model

A

gathers enough high-
quality information about candidates to predict the
likelihood of their success on the varied demands of the
job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

compensatory selection system

A

a good score on one
test can compensate for a lower score on another test.

23
Q

clinical decision making

A

Method that uses
judgment to combine information to make a decision
about the relative value of different candidates or
applicants

24
Q

statistical decision making

A

Method that
combines information according to a mathematical
formula

25
hurdle system
oftentimes there are minimum scores that must be met to move forward if a candidate does not achieve a minimum score at any hurdle, they are eliminated.
26
multiple hurdle system
Strategy constructed of multiple hurdles so that candidates who do not exceed each of the minimum dimension scores are excluded from further consideration
27
score banding
Method of selection in which people with similar scores are grouped together in a category or score band, & selection within the band is then made based on other considerations
28
subgroup norming
involves developing separate lists for applicants based on their membership to different demographic groups (e.g., race/ethnicity, sex), & then ranking them within their respective group
29
deselection
you're fired! and you're fired! everybody is getting fired!
30
termination for cause
Job loss that occurs when an individual is fired from an organization for a particular reason.
31
layoffs
Job loss due to employer downsizing or reductions in force; often comes without warning or with a generic warning that the workforce will be reduced.
32
large staffing projects
Large-scale staffing decisions in organizations involve significant challenges due to the volume of applicants (often more than 60,000).
33
small staffing project
A small-scale decision, such as selecting a shift manager for a local coffeehouse, involves only a handful of applicants.
34
employment litigation primarily stems from decisions related to...
hiring, promotion, or layoffs, rather than specific practices or assessment devices
35
who must commonly brings up lawsuits?
employees or former employees
36
expert witness
a witness in a lawsuit who is permitted to voice opinions about organizational practices. can often be IO psychologists.
37
employment discrimination
Employment decision making or working conditions that are advantageous (or disadvantageous) to members of one group compared to members of another group.
38
cra 1866
Passed to support 13th amendment
39
cra of 1875
relied on equal protection clause of 14th amendment
40
cra of 1957
established US commission on civil rights, mostly about voting rights
41
cra of 1960
expanded authority to protect voting rights, required maintenance of voting records, cannot flee state to avoid prosecution
42
in summary, previous legislation...
* Lacked enforcement * Mostly focused on voting rights * Mostly focused on race * Had limited support
43
civil rights act of 1964
* Proposed by JFK * Controversial, with mixed support * Sex was added by Howard Smith, motivation unclear Title VII
44
Title VII
bans discrimination in unions, schools, and employment; establishes EEOC
45
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
* Enforcement agency for most discrimination EEO laws, including * Title VII * ADA * ADEA * Equal Pay Act * Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 * Responsible for investigating complaints made by employees, within 60 days of complaint
46
disparate treatment
Intentional, Unequal treatment of protected class members
47
steps for establishing a prima facie case
step 1: 1. Applicant belongs to a protected group 2. Applicant applied and was qualified for a job the employer was trying to fill 3. Applicant, though qualified, was rejected for the position 4. Employer continued to seek applicants with applicant’s qualifications step 2: 1. Defendant provides a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for rejection of person step 3: 1. Plaintiff shows organizations reason for rejection is just pretext
48
griggs vs duke power co (1971)
* Duke Power Company introduced new hiring criteria requiring a high school diploma and a passing score on aptitude tests. * disproportionately excluded African American employees from better-paying jobs.
49
adverse impact
a type of discrimination that acknowledges the employer may not have intended to discriminate against a plaintiff, but an employer practice did have an adverse impact on the group to which the plaintiff belongs.
50
80 percent rule
if it can be shown that a protected group received less than 80 percent of the desirable outcomes (e.g., job offers, promotions) received by a majority group
51
adverse impact ratio
obtained by dividing the selection ratio of the protected group by the selection ratio of the majority group * if this ratio is lower than 80 percent, there is evidence of adverse impact.
52
bona fide occupational qualification (bfoq)
an exception to discrimination in the event that you SPECIFICALLY need to cast a certain demographic of people
53
current developments in employment law
1. intersectionality and previously ignored groups 2. genetic information nondiscrimination act 3. lilly ledbetter fair pay act 4. lgbt discrimination in employment- sex discrimination 5. crown act (creating a respectful and open world for natural hair)