SOCIAL INQUALITY
definitions
standard of living and quality of life
standard of living = the ability to access services and goods
quality of life = the extent in which needs or desires are met
its subjective and includes : work, health , family issues , leisure tim e
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATORS
5 categories
income
housing
education
healthcare
employment
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATORS
income
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATIORS
housing
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATIORS
education
qualification rates = gaps between literacy
HOWEVER = doesnt account for informal education eg: cooking anf farming
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATIORS
healthcare
SOCIAL INQUALITY INDICATIORS
employment
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
spatial patterns ( wealth )
(4)
-elderly people = poorer due to relying on a pension and not working
- women = less likely to be hired due to risk of pregnancy, many woemn are housewives, women are discriminated agains in high class jobs
- LIDCS - poorer schooling = trapped in poverty cycle
- rural areas = poorer due to lower payed jobs not in cities = may affect quality of life and standard of living
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
spatial patterns ( housing )
(2)
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
spatial patterns ( health )
(3)
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
spatial patterns ( education )
(4)
SOCIAL INEQUALITY
spatial patterns ( access to services )
(4)
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI
social economic characteristics
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI
characteristics
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI
location
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI vs NORTHWOOD
housing
JEMBATAN BESI (SLUMS)
NORTHWOOD
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI vs
employment
JEMBATAN BESI (SLUM)
NORTHWOOD
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI vs
education
JEMBATAN BESI (SLUM)
-schools poorly equipped, families often dont put in formal education as they need them to work for money
NORTHWOOD
CONTRASTING PLACES
JEMBATAN BESI vs
health
JEMBATAN BESI (SLUM)
NORTHWOOD
CONTRASTING PLACES
NORTHWOOD
location
CONTRASTING PLACES
NORTHWOOD
characteristics
CONTRASTING PLACES
NORTHWOOD
socio economic
CONTRASTING PLACES
poverty cycle = place specific
growing up
education
work
growing up = $4 a day, poor household
education
- need to work for money
- overcrouded
- 5 people per house = cant study
- lack of personal mobility
- poor attendance due to illness ( collerah )
- poor education facilities
jobs
- no qualifications
- garment factory, scavenging, street food
- informal jobs = no tax = no mult effect
CONTRASTING PLACES
wealth cycle = place specific
growing up
education
work
growing up
- 91% owner occupied
- good quality of life
- large spacious $1 mill houses
education
- 5 high school = good achievemts
- lack of illnes, many hospitals, low pollution
- easy to study = only 2.8 per house
-unis ( 70% with degree )
jobs
- wealth of oppotunity
- toshiba, blizzard entratainment, jobs at univercity
- high payed