Why are both these reactions successfull
These Diels-Alder reactions utilise an “electron deficient” dieneophile and an “electron rich” diene
In the following ethene molecule there are 2
π orbitals contributing the the π system, therefore we can get 2 possible molecular orbtials
What does this look like?
Which is the HOMO and which is the LUMO?
In the following butadiene molecule there are four π orbitals contributing to the π system, therefore we can get four possible molecular orbitals
What does this look like?
Which one is the HOMO and LUMO?
Why is the interaction between the LUMO of the dienophile and the HOMO of the diene a favourable one
For this more complicated example, we can obtain representations of the HOMO and LUMOs from calculations, and project the molecular orbitals onto the electron density surfaces
How does the regioselectivity relate to the Klopman’s equation?
You always get the major product from…
the largest two lobes interacting
Results in better “orbital contribution” - Klopman’s equation
How do the orbitals interact to form the major product
When considering π-electrons in these alkenes, we see them as being “trapped” in a linear 1D box as defined by schrodiners equation
What does the wavefunction tell us?
(wavefunction(Ψ) determines the probability density of finding the system at a given position)
Relating to wavefunction, allow one bond length at each end of the molecule, and draw sine wave for ethene
(For both HOMO and LUMO)
Relating to wavefunction, allow one bond length at each end of the molecule, and draw sine wave for butadiene
(For both HOMO and LUMO)
The number of nodes =
The Ψ number - 1
i.e. for the LUMO = Ψ3-1 = 2 nodes
What is a key feature of the molecular orbital diagrams relating to wavefunction