actues reus of murder
unlawful killing of a reasonable creature under the kings peace
general rule regarding an omission
an omission wont be the actues reus of an offence
general exception to omission rule
murder can be committed through an omission where theres a pre exisiting duty to act
r v martin?
force was unnessecary and unlawful
what does ag ref no3 of 1994 say
an unborn child isnt a reasonable creature so cannot be murdered
life begins at birth
r v malcharek and steel
life ends when your brain stem dead
airdale nhs trust v bland
life sustaining treatment can/cannot be withdrawn from a patient in a persistent vegetative state as long as the court has given permission and it is in the patients best interests to do so
dpp v clegg
a country isnt under the kings peace when war has been declared
vickers?
intention to cause GBH but not to cause death is sufficient to establish the mens rea for murder
r v matthews and alleyne
the jury may find oblique intention by considering the Woollin test: is the consequence virtually certain (VC) as a result of D’s actions and does D know this?
two types of mens rea
express or implied
two types of express malice
direct- d aims to kill
indirect- d realises death is VC
two types of implied malice
direct- aims to cause gbh
indirect- d realises gbh is VC
wheres murder defined
This is defined in common law as an unlawful killing with malice aforethought.