S1(1) Theft Act 1968
Theft is dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive
s3(1)
Appropriation means D assumes the rights of an owner (ie acts like they own the property)
R v Morris
D only needs to assume 1 right to have appropriated property (rather than all rights of an owner)
R v Pitham and Hehl
Property can be appropriated even if D never touches/removes the property (as long as they still have assumed rights by acting like they own it)
Lawrence v MPC
Property can still be appropriated regardless of weather the taking was consensual
R v Hinks
Even accepting a genuine gift can be an appropriation
s3(1)
Appropriations may initially be innocent, and later turn into
dishonest appropriations
s4(1)
Property can be money (cash), real (land), personal (any other
physical item), things in action (money in a bank account) or other intangible objects (copyrights)
s4(2)
Land can only really be stolen if something attached to the land is severed from it; if a tennant removes/damages a fixture of the land let to him; or if someone trusted with the property abuses their power.
R v Welsh
Bodily fluids do count as personal property
R v Kelly and Lindsay
Body parts do NOT count as property unless they are for medical, scientific or educational use.
Oxford v Moss
Information/Knowledge does NOT count as property
s5(1)
Belonging to another means someone other than D has
possession, control, or proprietary rights over the property
R v Turner
Even if D technically owns property, it may still belong to another if they have possession or control over it.
Ricketts v Basildon Magistrates
For property to be abandoned, the owner must have had no
specific intention for what happened to it. Otherwise, the owner retains a proprietary interest in the property until their intention is fulfilled.
s5(3) Davidge v Burnett
Where D is given property with a legal obligation for how to use it, the property still belongs to another
s5(4) AG Ref (No 1 of 1983)
Where D is given property by mistake, the property still belongs to another
s2(1)(a) ROBINSON
D is not dishonest if he believes he has a legal right to the property
s2(1)(b) HOLDEN
D is not dishonest if he believes the owner would consent to the taking in the circumstances
s2(1)(c) SMALL
D is not dishonest if he believes the owner could not be found by taking reasonable steps
s2(2)
D taking the property may still be dishonest even if they were willing to pay for the property
Ivey v Genting (the Ivey test)
If the exceptions don’t apply, it sets out a 2 part test to be applied
The only way for the jury to find D dishonest is:
1. Decide what D believed the circumstances of the situation
to be, then
2. Decide if D’s conduct (in those circumstances) would be
dishonest by the ordinary standards of the reasonable and
honest person
s6(1)
Intention to permanently deprive means D INTENDED to treat property as their own to dispose of
DPP v Lavender
Even if D does not remove property, intending to permanently
treat it as their own is enough