What is LINGUISTICS? What does it study?
The study of language as a system of human communication. Linguistics studies messages with careful attention to words and phrases to see how they are used to communicate information, thoughts, and feelings.
What is GRAMMAR?
Grammar describes the speaker’s knowledge of the language; it is a formal device with a finite set of rules that generates the sentences in the language. Therefore, grammars are theories of language, composed of more specific hypotheses about the organization of the language.
What are the criteria that a grammar must fulfil?
OBSERVATIONAL ADEQUACY (it should specify what is and what is not an acceptable sequence in the language, referring to syntax, semantics and phonetics) and DESCRIPTIVE ADEQUACY (it must explain how a sentence relates to other sentences that are similar in meaning, opposite in meaning and so on)
Why is the PHONOLOGICAL COMPONENT useful? (grammar components)
Because it makes the sound system of the language explicit
What should the PHONOLOGICAL COMPONENT give us information about? (grammar components)
How may phonemes are there in British English and how can they be analyzed?
There are 44 phonemes. They can be analyzed in terms of features such as voicing, energy, manner and place of articulation and aspiration.
What’s the difference between phones and phonemes?
Phones are individual speech sounds, while phonemes are the smallest units that distinguish meaning.
What is the relation between the SEMANTIC COMPONENT and GRAMMATICALITY? (grammar components)
The study of semantics refers to the study of meaning. This does not necessarily correspond to grammaticality because many ungrammatical sentences are meaningful. Many of the sentences that are uttered by non-native speakers of English are perfectly comprehensible, despite the fact that they do not follow the rules of English. The reverse side of the picture is sentences that are grammatically correct but that, because of the content, are meaningless.
How would a semantic approach help us to understand something about the nature of language?
One way that might be helpful would be as a means of accounting for the oddness we experience when we read some English sentences. These sentences, such as “the hamburger ate the man”, may be syntactically good, but semantically odd since “hamburgers” are not capable of eating.
What do Downing and Lock (2006) state about SYNTACTIC COMPONENT? (grammar components)
The moving around of bits of language suggests that language is not a series of words strung together like beads on a string. Language is patterned, that is, certain regularities can be distinguished throughout every linguistic manifestation in a text. A unit will be defined as any stretch of language which constitutes a semantic whole and which has a recognized pattern that is repeated regularly in speech and writing.
What are the four structural units in English? Arranged in order of magnitude
Clause → phrase → word → morpheme.
What are the three kind of factors that a psychologically useful model of language will have to deal with?
Explain the theory of first language acquisition based on the role of IMITATION
Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitation and reinforcement. The popular view was that children copy the utterances they hear, and by having the correct utterances reinforced and the wrong ones corrected, they gradually build up their linguistic competence.
Explain the critics to theory of first language acquisition based on the role of IMITATION
Even if imitation is important, the grammatical component cannot be acquired only in this way. Two main pieces of evidence support this criticism:
1. The way children deal with irregular forms in language. When they encounter the past form of an irregular verb or the irregular plural of a noun, they regularise them to a form that follows the regular verb and noun changes. They cannot learn these forms by a process of imitation because no adult will use them.
2. Children’s lack of ability to imitate grammatical structures even when elicited to do so. The treatment of these structures suggests that children’s language acquisition is more a matter of maturation than of imitation.
Explain the critics to theory of first language acquisition based on the role of INNATENESS
Chomsky rejected the behaviorist perspective and adopted instead a mentalist viewpoint. In 1965, Chomsky had concluded that children were born with some kind of special language processing ability and had proposed the existence of a “language acquisition device” (LAD). Although a child’s experience with language input could have an effect on language learning, the ultimate form will be a function of the universal language that exists in the human mind. Universal Grammar theory posits the existence of a set of basic grammatical elements or fixed abstract principles that are common to all natural human languages and that predispose children to organize the input in certain ways. The principles themselves are thought to be innate, a product of the LAD.
What are the innate linguistic properties of the language acquisition device (LAD) as suggested by Brown (1994), inspired by the ideas of Chomsky?
The ability to distinguish speech sounds from other sounds; the ability to organize language into a system of structures; the knowledge of what was possible and what was not possible in any linguistic system; the ability to construct the simplest possible system based on the linguistic data to which one was exposed.
Explain the critics to theory of first language acquisition based on the role of COGNITION
According to Piaget, linguistic structures will only emerge if there is an already-established cognitive foundation. This has been proved to some extent in the sensor-motor stage (up to eighteen months), as children begin to name classes of objects after they have developed a sense of object permanence. However, it is difficult to show precise correlations between general cognitive abilities and linguistic development, and the issue becomes more and more complex as the children develop.
Explain the critics to theory of first language acquisition based on the role of INPUT
In the 1970s, studies of “motherese” (the special way of talking to get the most of children that is developed by mothers), showed that parental input is adapted in a way that facilitates language acquisition by the children. Several characteristics were outlined:
- Simplicity: utterances are shorter and meanings are in proximity of the children
- Clarity: sentences are repeated and paraphrased several times
- Expressive: these words show an affective element of motherese
- Attention-catching: high pitch voice when addressing the baby and high rising intonation utterances
What is the difference between the way language is used at home and at school?
At home, language serves that Halliday calls “interpersonal functions”. Language was primarily an instrument for social interaction.
The language of the school is different. On the one hand, it focuses on the “ideational function”, the expression of ideas. On the other hand, levels of formal and informal speech are carefully distinguished, and standards of correctness emphasized.
According to behaviorism (theory of foreign language acquisition), what is the view of learning?
According to the theory, behavior happens in associative chains; all learning is thus characterized as associative learning or habit formation, brought about by the repeated association of a stimulus with a response (Hadley, 2001)
What method emerged as a result of behaviorism (theory of foreign language acquisition)?
The audio-lingual method (1950s - 1960s). This method consisted of an unending series of drills followed by positive or negative reinforcement. It incorporated structural linguistic theory (use of drills), and the language habit was formed by the repetition of correct utterances which were reinforced by the teacher. Mistakes were immediately criticized and errors played no part in language learning.
What are the five central hypotheses of The Monitor Theory (theory of foreign language acquisition)?
Explain THE ACQUISITION-LEARNING HYPOTHESIS (The Monitor Theory: theory of foreign language acquisition)
It states that adults have two distinct and independent ways of developing competence in a second language: acquisition, which is a subconscious process similar, if not identical, to the way children develop ability in their first language, and learning, which refers to the conscious knowledge of the rules of grammar of a second language and their application in production.
Explain THE NATURAL ORDER HYPOTHESIS (The Monitor Theory: theory of foreign language acquisition)
It maintains that acquisition of grammatical structures (primarily morphemes) follows a predictable order then that acquisition is natural (e.g. not via learning)