17) Numbers and Counting Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

What is Relative Numerosity discrimination?

A

Ability to discriminate between sets of items on the basis of relative number of items they contain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an example of Relative numerosity discrimination?

A

Emmerton, Lohmann & Niemann 1997

Trained pigeons to discriminate between few and many items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the concept of absolute number?

A

A number is not related to what you are counting, its an abstract and unrelated thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an example of absolute number?

A

Matsuzawa (1985)

Chimp had to select one of six response keys when shown array of pencils. Achieved +90% accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What could the animals be doing instead of distinguishing numbers?

A

Perceptual matching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did Matsuzawa (1985) argue it wasn’t perceptual matching?

A

Could transfer the ability to arrays of different items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What other aspects could animals be using to pass the absolute number test?

A

Time and space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Meck & Church (1983) also believe was a potential confound of absolute number test?

A

Serially presented items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Meck & Church (1983) test?

A

Trained rats with two signals after either 2 or 8 pulses of noise then press either left or right lever response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was a potential confound of Meck & Church (1983)?

A

The animals were responding on the basis of total time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Meck & Church (1983) reduce the effect of total times effect?

A

Tested with stimuli lasting same amount of time but different number of pulses

Should be impossible is using time to distinguish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Davis & Bradford (1986) test?

A

Rats exposed to plank of food but experimenter shouted once they ate a certain amount. When they ate the right number they were praised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Gelman & Gallistel (1978) believe about ability to count?

A

Argued that counting involves mapping
numerosity onto a label that represents that numerosity.
-Animals must use nonverbal labels (numerons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 3 principles does the process of counting involve?

A

-One to one principle
-Stable order principle
-Cardinal principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the One to one principle?

A

in which each item is assigned only one neuron

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Stable order principle?

A

Numerons must always be assigned in
the same order

17
Q

What is the Cardinal principle?

A

The final numeron assigned applies to the
whole display

18
Q

What did Dacke & Srinivasan (2008) test?

A

Bees were trained that sucrose would be given at certain landmark intervals

-Found bees could count to 4
-Can be transferred to novel items

19
Q

What did Brannon & Terrace (2000) test?

A

If Chimps can understand representation of number

20
Q

How did Brannon & Terrace (2000) test chimps

A

-Trained to order arrays of 1-4 items in different orders

21
Q

What did Brannon & Terrace (2000) find?

A

They could learn ascending and descending orders, but not the arbitrary order 1-3-2-4

22
Q

What did Brannon & Terrace (2000) find when testing novel displays of 5-9 items?

A

The chimp taught an ascending order could generalise to higher numbers
-BUT the one taught descending order needed further training

23
Q

What did Boysen & Berntson (1989) study?

A

If chimps have ability to do arithmetic

24
Q

How did Boysen & Berntson (1989) test chimps on arithmetic?

A

-Trained to label number of objects in different formats for numbers 0-4
-Had to find oranges around an area and then indicate an arabic numeral that represented the sum
-When used cars with numbers written on, could also successfully complete the task

25
What did Boysen & Bertson (1995) test?
If when choosing between two groups of food, that they could distinguish the first they chose was given to another chimp and they got what was left
26
What did Boysen & Bertson (1995) find?
They were completely unable to solve this task unless the food was substituted by numerals