aim of practical
to investigate gender differences between males and females and pro social behaviour
IV of practical learning
males or female
DV of learning practical
number of pro social behaviours
directional hypothesis of learning experiment
females will show more pro social behaviour than males
null hypothesis learning practical
there will be no significant difference between the numbers of pro social behaviours in females compared to males if there is its due to chance
who were the participants of the learning practical
members of stourbridge town in mcdonald’s
what sampling method was used for the learning practical
opportunity
what apparatus was used for the learning practical
frequency table to tally each time a male or female shows pro social or anti social behaviour - pen and paper
pilot study of practical learning
walk around the areas and pick appropriate places do a practice run and operationalise variables - consider how to record the data and controls and ethics
what was the procedure of the learning practical
used event sampling of everytime we saw a behaviour in 10 mins and decided qualitative data based on quotes and context
naturalistic covert observation non participants for 10 minutes in mcdonald’s
tallying everytime a male or female showed pro social or anti social behaviour
controls of learning practical
no observer bias as there was two of us and we did it at the same time of day and sat in a place where you had a clear view and tallied everytime we saw the behaviours
ethical issues with the practical learning
no consent as it was in a public place and a covert observation as we were pretending to be college students - deception