research methods (yr2) Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

what are investigator effects, suggest one way in which they could be minimised

A

investigation effects is when the experiment is influenced by the researchers behaviour. You could use a double blind procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does reliability mean

A

the consistency of the data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

one reason why it is important for scientific reports to include a referencing section

A

so you are not plagiarising the work and you give them credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a pilot study

A

a small scale trial run of a planned investigation that takes place before the real investigation is carried out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why is a pilot study carried out

A

aim is to check procedures, materials, measuring techniques and to identify if there are any issues.
this way pilot studies ensures that planned investigations are fit for purpose by allowing the researcher to identify any flaws.
this saves time and money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a type 1 error

A

false positive, if you choose 0.1, you might accept your experimental hypothesis when there is really no correlation and you should accept the null

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a type 2 error

A

false negative, when you accept the null hypothesis when you should be accepting the experimental. this if you choose 0.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how to improve internal validity

A

do a pilot study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how to improve external validity

A

have a large range of P’s that are representative of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how to assess internal validity

A

face validity - look at the research - on the face of it does it look like it is measuring what it intends to, and if it had mundane realism

concurrent validity - compare the findings to a different study that was investigating a similar thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

assess external validity

A

conduct the research again

on diff p’s
in diff settings (ecological)
in diff time periods (temporal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

process of peer review

A

other psychologists check the research report before deciding whether it could be published

  • work is considered in terms of its validity, significance and originality
  • assessment of the appropriateness of the methods and designs used
  • reviewer can accept the manuscript as it is, accept with revisions, suggest the author makes revisions and re-submits or reject without the possibility of re-submission
  • editor makes the final decision whether to accept or reject the research report based on the reviewers’ comments/recommendations
  • research proposals are submitted to panel and assessed for merit.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

order of the report

A

abstract, introduction, method, results, discussions and references

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

abstract

A

summary (100-150 words), context, aim, participants, method, procedure, findings and conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

introduction

A

background theory, aims, hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

method

A

design, participants, materials, procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

results

A

descriptive statistics, inferential statistics

18
Q

discussion

A

conclusion, background research, strengths & limitations, implications, further research

19
Q

references

A

author last name + initals
year of publication
title
publisher + location
volume.

20
Q

kuhn’s paradigm (features of a science)

A

psychology had many paradigms and would never be able to become a science as it has failed to develop 1 paradigm

21
Q

3 paradigms

A

behaviorist, humanistic, cognitive

22
Q

what is the humanistic paradigm

A

places great value on subjective experience

22
Q

what is the behaviorist paradigm

A

argues scientific knowledge is operational and that events can be verified by experiments. but this means that only observable can be measured in experiments and therefore rules out the human mind.

22
Q

what is the cognitive paradigms

A

are into consciousness and thought processes - interested in memory, perception and language - these are part of what we call our private and conscious experience

23
what features are there that make something scientific
1. constructing theories and testing hypotheses 2. falsifiability 3. empirical methods 4. replicability 5. objectivity 6. paradigm
24
what is theory construction and hypothesis testing
a theory is a set of ideas that explain something, it generates testable hypothesis
25
deductive process of a theory
observe behavior propose theory generate hypothesis test hypothesis draw conclusions
26
why is theory construction an important feature of how science works
theories help generate testable hypothesis which can then be investigated through empirical research. the date obtained can be used to support, refine or refute the theory.
27
how does psych use theory construction and hypothesis testing
psychology uses deductive reasoning in theory and hypothesis conclusion, so it largely meets this feature of science. however, some areas of psychology are less scientific because their theories make it difficult to form testable hypothesis
28
what is falsifiability
a theory must be testable and capable of being proven false through evidence if we don't have falsifiability, then it is considered unscientific because theories cannot be empirically tested for supported evidence.
29
how does psychology use falsifability
many areas are falsifiable since they involve testable hypothesis and empirical research
30
what is replicability
ability to repeat a study to see if the same result are found when testing the same thing again
31
why is replicability useful
it establishes validity. if the results are the same it adds value to the data and affirms the original results.
32
how does psychology use reliability
most of the research methods used in psych is replicable, meaning other researchers can repeat the study to test the replicability of the findings. however there are research methods used which are difficult to replicate, e.g HM and KF since P's cant be reproduced
33
objectivity and use of the empirical method
people have to have direct experience and evidence to support something. (empirical) researchers must retain objectivity during their empirical research, their personal opinions must not affect the research outcome.
34
how does psychology increase objectivity
double blind procedure controlled methods operationalized variables however, some subjective experiences cannot be directly measured. these rely in interpretation, making objectivity harder to maintain
35
what is a paradigm
a worldview on reality
36
does psych have a paradigm
there is an agreement that psychology studies the mind and behaviour
37
does psychology experience paradigm shifts
it is possible as the major approaches in psych did not emerge all at once
38
why does kuhn believe psych is a pre-science
because unlike true scientific revolution, old paradigms were never completely replaced.