Syntax Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

How we interpret a sentence, other than words. Provide an example of this

A

Dog chase cats. Cats chase dogs. (Both are understandable yet differ in meaning)
Chase dogs cats (does not really make sense)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rules that govern how we combine words into phrases and phrases into sentences

A

Syntax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe phrase structure

A

Sentence=noun phrase+ verb phrase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe noun phrase structure

A

(Article)+ (adjective)+ noun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe verb phrases

A

Verb+ (propositional phrase)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Deascribe prepositional phrase

A

Preposition+ noun phrase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe transformational grammar with “the man who was running is bald”

A

You can turn it into a question by moving is- is the man who was man running bald (grammatical)
ungrammatical: “was the man who running is bald”- can’t move the was because it was part of an embedded clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the points of evidence that syntax is psychologically real?

A

Children with minimal knowledge of grammar can make adult-like grammaticality judgements
Damage to the left hemisphere can impair syntactic processing independent of semantic processing
Sentences that are syntactically complex take longer to read independent of their length
If you give a syntactic anomaly mid sentence, the brain registers it before the sentence’s meaning can be contemplated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Do we mostly produce grammatical sentences? At what age ranges?

A

Yes we do, unless there are certain impairments, even as young children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Are children able to tell if sentences are grammatically off? Provide an example of a study.

A

Asks 2 year old children do the sentences sound silly:
Clothes iron
Song me a sing
Ball me throw
Cup find
Were suggested to correct the sentences, and were able to- iron clothes, sing me a song, fill the cup, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Provide an example of 7 year olds being able to understand grammar

A

Are able to tell “Golf plays the sister” is not gramatically correct when “The sister plays golf” is, Understand is and are. Children were generally found to agree with adult grammar judgements especially by 7, over chance by 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Language area in the left inferior frontal gyrus

A

Broca’s area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Language area in the left superior temporal gyrus

A

Wernicke’s area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Language areas in the brain are only on which sides of the brain?

A

Only on the left side of the brain, not mirrored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

language disorder

A

Aphasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Patients with Broca’s areas would have impairments in…

A

Lose the ability to combine noun and verbs in sentences, ungrammatical yet still meaningful for conveying meaning

17
Q

Broca’s area is more critical for?

A

Syntax, broken sentences

18
Q

Patients with Wernicke’s aphasia have impairments in?

A

meanings and semantics, can make grammatical yet is non-meaningful

19
Q

Wernicke’s aphasia leads to?

A

Spared syntax but are unable to find the words they are trying to retrieve.

20
Q

Describe processing speed with “Sherlock saw the man using binoculars”

A

Technically can be used in two ways. “the man using binoculars” can either be attached to “saw” (minimal attachment) while the second one, Sherlock saw the man using binoculars, using is used to describe the man (nonminimal attachment) because it uses different levels

21
Q

Describe “the spy saw the cop with binoculars/revolver but the cop didn’t see him”

A

Binocular takes longer to read because binocular sentence could be interpreted with different ways- cop or spy both have binoculars. Revolver sentence is simpler because you can’t see someone with a revolver

22
Q

How was EEGs used to measure whether syntax was neurologically detectable

A

Recorded ERPs (EEG data) as participants read grammatical or ungrammatical sentences like “the doctor hoped the patient was lying”/ “the doctor forced the patient was lying”. It was found that spike in activity occurs 600 ms following the first sign of a syntactic error- positive spike of activity

23
Q

Describe the monster-name study

A

most adults label the monster a rat-eater instead of rats-eater after being primed with paper-eater and glue-eater. 3 year olds do the same. Done because of rules for applying affixes. Compound (-eater) takes precedent over plurals, so the #s is dropped out

24
Q

How do we know language level rules?

A

“Language instinct”- humans are born with Language Acquisition device to learn basic rules- you speak the language that is modeled for in your community. Differences between languages are superficial but shared syntactic notion that are shared

25
How do languages differ?
Differ in phonemes, morphemes, words and phrases, also differ in some syntactic rules (object follow verbs or precede verbs) but at least 45 syntactic rules are universal
26
Do children deprived of linguistic input show evidence of a language instinct
Children who are deaf and parents who teach them spoken language invent their own signing conventions in order to communicate. It was found that children made distinct signs, so did parents, but children came up with their own signs that their parents did not use discretely. If shared, home signs can become a language
27
Describe the basis of Nicaraguan sign language
Deaf Nicaraguans were isolated from one another until 1977. School attempted to teach children spoken Spanish. Children instead pooled together their home signs into their own sign language
28
What was the question of Senghas et al?
Is Nicaraguan Sign Language a “true” language? Do syntactic rules emerge?
29
What are the alternatives of Senghas et al?
Yes, NHL embodies discreteness and combinatorial patterning (how discrete signs are combined) No, NHL is just a widespread gesture system with no underlying structure
30
What is the logic of Senghas et al?
If NSL is a true language, then NSL signers should express the manner and path of a motion event with different signs
31
What was the method of Senghas et al?
30 NSL, 10 per generation and 10 non-deaf Spanish speakers. Participants were shown Bug’s bunny cartoons and asked to describe what they saw.
32
What are the results of Senghas et al
Spanish speaker articulate manner and path simultaneously while NSL signer articulate manner and path sequentially, particularly in Cohort 2 and Cohort 3
33
What are the inferences of Senghas et al?
Within just 30 years, NSL acquired the discrete, combinatorial properties true of other languages NSL has greater expressive power than a gesture system in that it allows for hierarchical constructions Humans do not merely transmit language, they create it