Class 2 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

What is social cognition?

A

the ways people perceive, interpret, and think about themselves and others in social contexts

  • How we make sense of social interactions / contexts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Interpersonal gap in communication?

A

Interpersonal gap = disconnect between what the sender intends to communicate and the effect of the communication on the perceiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the interpersonal gap work?

  • What does the sender do?
  • What does the receiver do?
A

Sender:
- Their private intentions
- Their actions
- Encode both into a message

(The method of encoding and noise influence the message received)

Receiver:
- This causes an effect on the listener
- Have private interpretations of the senders message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of how our social interactions are ambiguous:

(Sorta freebie)

A

Is my girlfriend laughing at her ex’s jokes because it’s a party and she’s just
being friendly, or is she still hung up on him?

Is the cute stranger I’m chatting up flirting back or are they just being polite?

Is he taking a long time to text back because he’s busy, or because he doesn’t
want to talk to me?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is attributional conflict often seen with couples?

A

couple conflict is rooted in disagreements about the meaning of an event rather than disagreement about its occurrence

  • Ex. Liking an ex’s pic
    1. Blip / no thought
    2. Threat to relationship

(Don’t disagree it happened, but disagree on the meaning behind liking it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Empathic accuracy?

A

How good we are at mind reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Empathic inference?

A

the everyday mind reading we do to attempt to figure out others’ thoughts and feeling

  • Our attempt to understand other’s thoughts and feelings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Measuring empathic accuracy: What is the Dyadic interaction paradigm

A

Step 1: Key & Peele have natural, unobtrusively recorded interaction

  • Step 2: Key watches video and marks spots where he had a specific, clearly remembered thought or feeling. Peele does the same thing.
  • Step 3: Key watches the video again and records his inference about Peele’s
    thoughts/feelings. Peele does the same thing for Key.
  • Step 4: Researchers compare Key’s self-reported thoughts/feelings against
    Peele’s inferences (and vice versa).
  • Useful for making comparisons between different types of dyads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Measuring empathic accuracy: What is the Standard stimulus paradigm

A

Ppl watch a prerecorded viedo

  • Ppl in video reported thoughts and feelings at various points
  • Participants make guesses about the people in the video

And their score is calculated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Empathic accuracy is a function of _________?

A

perceiver ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Empathic accuracy is NOT predicted by?

A
  • Self reported empathy (sometimes even find opposite correlation)
  • Intelligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Empathic accuracy IS predicted by?

A
  • Age (but not beyond childhood)
    • Kids suck at understanding others
  • Gender (kind of?)
    • Women are sometimes better / sometimes not
    • Men are rarely better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two most important predictors of empathic accuracy?

A
  1. target characteristics
    - Some people are easier to read then others
  2. one’s relationship with the target
    - We are more accurate with partners and friends then strangers
    - We use subtle cues we pick up through knowing them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sometimes we are worse at reading those close to us?

Why?

A

Our Empathic accuracy declines after years of marriage

  • the interpersonal gap is sometimes
    larger between close others relative to
    strangers or casual acquaintance
    • Due to perspective taking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Perspective taking?

A

need to recognize that others do not see the world exactly as we do—we differ in knowledge, expectations, motivations,
perspectives ,etc.
* Perspective taking is a skill that is developed over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do we test perspective taking in young children (director task)?

A

Young children do not distinguish between what they know & what others
know—exhibit poor performance on standardized tasks like the Director Task

They need to instruct someone to move objects

  • They are both looking at diff perspectives of diff things
    (they need to understand what others see isn’t the same as you)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Perspective taking in adulthood

  • Ego Centric bias examples

What is false consensus effect

A

Overestimate extent to which others share our attitudes & feeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Perspective taking in adulthood

  • Ego Centric bias examples

What is Curse of knowledge

A

Use our own knowledge as guide to others’ knowledge

  • a cognitive bias where we incorrectly assume that everyone knows as much as we do on a given topic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Perspective taking in adulthood

  • Ego Centric bias examples

What is illusion of transparency

A

Overestimate extent to which our internal states are accessible to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Do ego centric biases change with age?

A

Yeah we get better at countering them as we get older

  • Become better at effortfully correcting initial egocentric interpretation by
    taking into account difference between self and other’s perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does the Dual-process model say about adult effortful correction of ego centric bias?

(2 stages)

A

Stage 1: automatic, effortless default (leans egocentric)

  • Stage 2: effortful correction

= Differences between children & adults on Director Task:
➢ Adults make fewer mistakes (although still make some!)
➢ But do not differ in tendency to look at egocentric object

TO SUM: Adults no less likely than children to consider the egocentric object, just
more likely to make the appropriate correction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the implications for the dual process model on ego centric bias?

A

Egocentric biases are increased under cognitive load—distractions, fatigue,
stress

  • Motivation reduces egocentric bias; lack of
    motivation amplifies it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

why are we sometimes more egocentric when communicating with close
others than with strangers?

A

We get complacent—motivation wanes, plus we assume that we know our
partner and that they share our perspective and so we let down our guard

So with strangers we assume their perspective is different & pay more attention
➢ E.g., less correction on Director Task when with a friend vs. stranger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why might women display higher levels of empathic accuracy?

A

: empathy forms a larger part of women’s desired self-image (e.g., due to socialization)

  • Can boost women’s effort and empathic accuracy by presenting them information that threatens their empathic skill as women
    (Given women article saying women score low on empathy, then given a mind reading task (they’ll want to disprove the article))
    - Better accuracy(men’s accuracy goes up when told women are attracted to empathy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Motivation seems to matter, but are there limits to this?
there are limits—for both men and women, the extra motivation boost does not help when target is hard to read
25
What is Motivated inaccuracy?
avoid being accurate when the truth could threaten the relationship or their self-view (If truth threatens the relationship we avoid it) * Example: heterosexual dating couples rated attractiveness of opposite-sex targets while partner observed * Participants who felt most threatened (dependent, insecure, or facing attractive rivals) exhibited least empathic accuracy
26
How does our desire to protect the relationship impact our accuracy or inaccuracy?
The motivation to preserve the relationship drives both empathic accuracy (to connect) and empathic inaccuracy (to protect), depending on context
27
Love is blind? How do ppl rate their relationships? Hints: (better, problems, chances, and superiority)
We tend to believe one’s own relationship is superior to that of other people * More realistic when thinking about more severe relationship problems—but, even then, are overly optimistic about improvement * Rate chances of their own marriages failing lower than their perceptions of the population base-rates * Exhibit higher levels of perceived relationship superiority when given threatening information
28
Researchers asked relationship partners, as well as their roommates and parents to evaluate the relationship & predict whether couple will still be together in 1 year Who was most accurate?
Partners were more optimistic, positive about the relationship, confident, and less accurate ➢ Roommates were most accurate
29
Is love realistic? In the roomate study, what was good predictors of relationship survival? (Asked to ppl in the relationship)
Earlier evaluations of one’s relationship quality do predict relationship outcomes - Your estimate of relationship quality (satisfied / serious) predicts relationship survival
30
If people report their satisfaction / seriousness what can this predict about their behaviour and knowledge?
They also predict how partners interact with each other (act nicely under observation) * People exhibit fairly high levels of accuracy about our partners’ traits and agree on traits central to partner’s self-concept (we aren't totally delusional, we know whats important to their identity)
31
What is Directional bias?
systematic tendency to overshoot or undershoot (e.g., my partner is warmer than everybody else) - They're better then everyone else - Rate them as 8 on warmth even if they're an IRL 6
32
What is Tracking accuracy?
ability to detect relative differences or changes in behaviour, even if baseline is biased (e.g., my partner seems less warm today) - They're behaving colder then normal to you or collegues
33
What is important to note about our biases and what we observe?
: people can hold a positive bias (seeing partners through “rose- coloured” glasses, while still being accurate trackers of day-to-day fluctuations and relative differences
34
Does Directional bias and tracking accuracy correlate? (Are they related skills)
a correlation of 0 (!) between the two = They are independent skills
35
What are examples of Global and Specific traits?
Global: - Wonderful - Greatest Specific: - Great listener - Attentive
36
For general / specific traits What do we see with newlyweds?
high levels of enhancement at global level * Generally high accuracy at trait level, but significant variability
36
How is it Possible to view partner positively at global level, while acknowledging specific positive & negative traits?
Global: - Wonderful Specific: - He never cleans the sink
37
The nature of positive illusions How can we structure our partners to appear better? 1. “Faults into virtues” technique 2. “Yes, but…” technique
1. “Faults into virtues” technique - Ex. partner discusses every point of the relationship - "Well it helps avoid lingering disagreements" 2. “Yes, but…” technique - Yes, she's impatient but she's trying!
38
How do these two techniques help relationships? 1. “Faults into virtues” technique 2. “Yes, but…” technique
They are automatic and predict relationship stability
39
What are the benefits to seeing your partner with positive directional bias and positive illusions?
Positive directional bias is associated with higher levels of of relationship quality * Longitudinal research shows that positive illusions predict improvements in relationship satisfaction and partner self-image over time
40
What is the Michelangelo phenomenon?
by affirming and supporting our aspirations, our partners help us reach our ideal selves - Maybe ”love is not blind, but prescient" (Seeing into the future)
41
What are Attributions?
explanations we make to understand causes of an event “my partner bought me flowers because… 1…he feels guilty” 2...he loves me” 3...he is a considerate person"
42
Two main types of attributions: Locus Dimension Stability Dimension
Locus Dimension - Internal / external cause Stability Dimension - Is it ongoing / repetitive or temporary
43
What combo of Locus Dimension Stability Dimension Do we want in relationships ?
External-temporary for negative events, "He's late because he's stuck in traffic" internal-stable for positive events "He's always on time because he values me"
44
How do we handle our desire for enhancement and our partners desire to be genuinely known
Positive global traits While having accurate specific traits In heterosexual marriages, wives’ more accurate specific perceptions associated with greater support behaviour, feelings of control within marriage, & decreased likelihood of divorce - Optimistic love may be stronger when grounded in specific accuracy
45
What combo of Locus Dimension Stability Dimension Do we NOT want in relationships ? DISTRESS MAINTAINING ATTRIBTUIONS
Seeing positive behaviours as external and temporary He got them from someone at work and is just regifting them to me Seeing negative behaviours as internal and stable She is such an irritable person
46
What are benevolent cognitions?
How charitable people are in relationship to partner (this depends on inital lvl of negativity in relationship) Predict satisfaction and declines in satisfaction (When couples start out more positively = they have more stable satisfaction When start out bad, their motivation to address is the issue falter and the problems fester)
47
What is construal?
Our interpretation of the event
48
But what influences our attributions and construals?
In any given interaction, bring our pre-existing knowledge of what: ➢ Our partner is like ➢ What people are like in general ➢ What relationships are like
49
Expectancy confirmation: How do we self confirm our schemas? 1. Perceptual 2. Behavioural
1) Perceptual confirmation: “we see what we expect to see” 2) Behavioural confirmation: “we behave in a way that makes our expectations happen
50
What is Rejection sensitivity?
tendency to “anxiously expect, readily perceive, and overreact to rejection" * High RS: people who anxiously expect rejection * Low RS: people who calmly expect acceptance Repeated experiences of rejection lead to formation of rejection expectancies * These expectancies are activated in situations where rejection is possible * Once activated, increase readiness to perceive rejection
51
What is attentional bias with rejection sensitivity?
For individuals high in RS, rejection-related cues more likely to capture attention
52
Study on Rejection sensitivity: Emotional stroop task:
Have to name the colours the words are written in Have words like rejection for one group Unrelated words for other group = If they take longer with rejection words, they may have a bias to rejection FOUND: It was specifically rejection words ppl paused on and paid attention to (not just negative words)
53
Another study on rejection sensitivity and perceptual confirmation: With other ppl (RS individuals more likely to construe ambiguous social behaviour of a stranger as rejecting)
Experiment involves two “get to know you” interactions with another “participant” * After first interaction, told 1 of 2 things: ➢ “Amy did not want to continue with second part of experiment” (ambiguous) ➢ “There is not enough time for the second interaction” Result = Rejection sensitivity linked to greater feelings of rejection in ambiguous condition
54
How do ppl high on Rejection sensitivity construe partner behaviour?
more likely to construe insensitive behaviour of new partners as intentionally rejecting (i.e., attribute behaviour to hurtful intent) * E.g., “If your partner was being cool and distant, you would feel they were being intentionally hurtful to you" If high: It's cuz they hate me If low: Well they're busy lately
55
How do ppl have a (self-fulfilling prophecy of rejection?
People who expect rejection tend to behave in ways that elicit rejection from close others High RS women displayed more negative behaviours (e.g., hostile tone, put-down, denial of responsibility) during interaction than low RS women * Partners of HRS women angrier about the relationship following discussion relative to partners of LRS women * Women’s negative behaviour accounted for 54% of the effect of women’s RS on their partner’ change in anger
56
Women with high RS male partners feel...?
Unsatisfied by men's jealous and controlling behaviour
57
Women with high RS aren't hostile, they are primed to act that way What is the likely explanation in why they display more negative behaviours?
Partner selection = Women with high RS may seek ppl to confirm belief (not likely, not just high RS women with partners who hate them) Most likely: Their reaction is a behavioural manifestation of hurt, anger, and frustration
58
How do we not see the fundamental attribution error?
Tendency to underestimate situational influences & overestimate dispositional influences on the behaviour of others Don’t realize that, in our relationship interactions, WE are often the situation WE CREATE the situation where ppl react hostilely
59