Substance dualism
There are two distinct types of ‘stuff’: physical and non-physical
So minds are not identical to material bodies or to parts of material bodies
Property dualism
Physical ‘stuff’ has two distinct kinds of properties: physical and non-physical properties
So mental properties are not identical to physical properties
Descartes substance dualism
Minds exist and are not identical to material bodies or to parts of material bodies.
There is a non-physical realm in which non-physical minds exist which is entirely separate from the physical realm
The ‘principle attribute’ of mental substance is thinking/consciousness (it is called res cogitans / thinking substance).
The ‘principle attribute’ of physical substance is extension in space (it is called res extensa / extended substance).
res cogitans
thinking substance
res extensa
extended substance
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
P1: I can clearly and distinctly conceive of my mind existing without my extended physical body
P2: Anything that I can clearly and distinctly conceive of is metaphysically possible
C1: Therefore, my mind existing without my extended physical body is metaphysically possible.
P3: If it is metaphysically possible for X to exist without Y then X is not identical to Y.
C2: Therefore, my mind is not identical with my extended physical body.
Descartes’ indivisibility argument for substance dualism
P1: My mind and my mental states cannot be conceived of as being divided
P2: Everything thought of as physical can be conceived of as being divided.
C: Therefore: minds and mental states are not physical.
The mary argument for property dualism
P1: Mary has propositional knowledge about all physical properties
P2: After seeing red for the first time Mary gains propositional knowledge.
P3: If she gains propositional knowledge then this knowledge must be about non physical properties.
C1: Therefore, there are non-physical properties.
C2: Therefore, property dualism is true.
Zombies argument for property dualism
P1: A zombie world is conceivable.
P2: If a zombie world is conceivable then it is metaphysically possible.
C1: Therefore, a zombie world is metaphysically possible.
P3: If a zombie world is metaphysically possible then phenomenal properties are not physical properties.
C2: Therefore, phenomenal properties are not physical properties.
Philosophical zombie
something physically identical to a conscious human being but which lacks consciousness entirely