Moral evil
harm or suffering that free agents are responsible for
Natural evil
harm or suffering that free agents are not responsible and are caused by natural events or processes
Logical problem of evil in standard form
P1: If God exists then God is omnibenevolent and so would be opposed to evil and would eliminate evil as far as it could.
P2: If God exists, then God is omnipotent and so would be able to eliminate evil
P3: If God exists then God is omniscient and so would know that evil exists and/or that it is about to come into existence.
C1: Therefore, if God exists then evil would not exist
P4: But evil exists.
C2: Therefore, God does not exist.
Evidential problem of evil in standard from
P1: If an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God exists, then any evil that exists must exist for a morally good reason.
P2: We do not know of any morally good reason that would justify the existence of certain evil events that exist
P3: If we do not know of any morally good reason for many evil events, then there probably isn’t a morally good reason for at least some of these events.
C1: Therefore, for at least some evil events, there probably isn’t a morally good reason that would justify them.
C2: Therefore, God probably doesn’t exist.
Difference between evidential and logical problem of evil
evidential: non-deductive, is intended to prove God’s existence is unlikely
logical: deductive, is intended to prove God’s existence is impossible
Defence
Only intended as a logically possible explanation as to why God permits evil
Theodicy
Intended to be a plausible or reasonable explanation as to why God permits evil
Plantinga’s free will defence
P1: Evil is the result of the free will of human beings.
P2: God creates creatures with free will because free will is so morally valuable that it is worth giving no matter how much evil it might lead to.
C1: Therefore, God has done the morally right thing in giving us free will, and we are to blame for the existence of evil.
C2: This is how God can be omnibenevolent even though evil exists
Hick’s soul making theodicy
P1: The existence of evil helps creatures to improve themselves morally/spiritually
P2: God creates evil because this chance for moral development is so morally valuable that it is worth the existence of the evil that enables it.
C1: Thus God has done the morally right thing in creating evil.
C2:This is how God can be omnibenevolent even though evil exists.