Despite peer review, the validity of the design or conclusions are what?
not guaranteed
Ultimately as a health professional you are responsible for what?
judging the validity and relevance of published material
Proper attitude is hard-nosed skepticism, due to ________ and _________ nature of ________ and _________ knowledge
uncertain
provisional
scientific
professional
Proper attitude is hard-nosed skepticism, due to investigation of what
complex phenomena
Proper attitude is hard-nosed skepticism, due to what constraints
ethical constraints
Ethical constraints prevent researchers from what
controlling certain variables
conducting experiments that might cause harm
Critical evaluation is done to identify what
strengths and weaknesses of research publication
Critical evaluation is done to ensure what?
patients receive assessment and treatment based on the best available evidence
Inadequacies in the introduction may signal what?
research was erroneously conceived or poorly planned
The literature review should be what
sufficiently complete to reflect current state of knowledge
unbiased in presenting unfavorable points of view
When critically evaluating the introduction what 3 things are you looking for?
clearly defined aims or hypotheses
selection of an appropriate research strategy
selection of appropriate variables/info to be collected
What is the most important part of a critical evaluation?
the methods section
The methods section is necessary for what?
understanding, evaluating, and replicating the research project
What will the methods section reveal
overall internal and external validity of the investigation
Internal validity
ability to attribute differences or changes observed to the independent variable (independent variable is the reason for change, not some other factor)
External validity
refers to how well the results of the study can be generalized to other contexts, populations, or settings
When critically evaluating the methods what 3 things are you looking for?
research participants/subjects
instrument/tools
research procedure
Research participants/subjects should include what?
sample modelling
sample size appropriate
description of the sample
What are you evaluating when considering instrument/tools
are they valid and reliable
What are you evaluating when considering research procedure
full description necessary for replication and evaluation of internal/external validity
What should be included in the procedure
control groups
participant assignment
blinding
treatment parameters
settings
What visuals should you be looking for when evaluating results
tables and graphs
calculations of statistics
What specifics about tables and graphs should be in the article
correctly tabulated or drawn
adequately labeled for interpretation
complete summaries of all relevant findings
What calculation of statistics specifics should be in the article
both descriptive and inferential statistics correctly calcuated