Persuadibility
High in persuadability are more likely to yield to persuasive messages, low persuadability are less likely to be influenced.
Ages to be persuaded
18-25 more likely as they are still in the process of forming their attitudes.
Self esteem and persuadability
lower, more likely to be influenced. See themselves as less capable and don’t regard their attitudes very highly. More likely to give up their current attitude.
Education/intelligence and persuadbility
more educated are less persuadable. More confident in their abilities to think critically and form their own attitudes.
Mood and persuadability
More likely when in a good mood
Perspective taking
saying like if you were in my shoes. Can backfire though if the person is very different from you, they might see your reasons as being less relevant.
Opposing arguments
If you ignore their arguments, you will be seen as biased, uninformed, manipulative.
Though, don’t mention opposing arguments if they are already inclined to support you.
Need for cognition
high in this people tend to think about things critically and analytically and enjoy problem solving. Low in it are less interested in effortful cognitive activity. Highly needed to take the central route more.
Self monitoring and succesptibility
People high in self monitoring are more concerned with projecting the right image, so they are more susceptible to image focused peripheral cues,
Promotion focus
act in ways that orient toward achieving positive outcomes.
Prevention focus
act in ways that orient away from negative outcomes.
How to be successful in resisting persuasion
We need to know what to resist, be motivated to resist it and have strategies that will be effective.
Narrative transportation theory
people are immersed into the imaginative world of whatever they are reading or watching, and adopt the attitudes and preferences of the characters with whom they identify. So more likely to buy products those characters use. People don’t realize they are being targeted.
Psychological reactance theory
proposes that people value thinking and acting freely. So situations that threaten their freedom arouse discomfort and prompt efforts to restore freedom
Who shows more reactance
Individualistics show more reactance when personal freedoms are attacked, collectivists show it when other students are threatened.
Example of being motivated to resist
People told to not pay mind to the testimony actually let it impact their decisions more. Forceful instructions to ignore it aroused more reactance, so they reestablished freedom by weighing it more heavily.
How to make sure people dont have reactance
To avoid reluctance, subtle suggestions work better than forceful directives.
Attitude inoculation
exposing people to weak forms of persuasive arguments should motivate them to produce the counter arguments.
How attitude innoculation helps resist persuasion
When they are exposed to strong forms later, they have an argument ready, and can more effectively resist.
Recognizing legit appeals
helps us know the deceptions they will use and increases our openness to legit appeals.
Example of recognizing legit appeals
Participants who learned how to detect manipulative intent were more likely to be persuaded by commercials by legit authorities.
What the Example of recognizing legit appeals shows
Shows how people are most likely to resist persuasion when their motivation to resist increases, and when they are given the means to do so (strategies). Also that when people are armed with the means to resist persuasion, they are also more open to appeals by legit authorities.
Intentional biases
People are inclined to selectively attend to information that confirms their original attitudes. Also selectively evaluate information.
Caffeine study and intentional biases
Female caffeine users found an article about the dangers of caffeine use for women less convincing than male caffeine users and both female and male non drinkers. So the closer to the individuals, less likely to believe.