Conflict:
occurs when one party perceives that its interests are being
opposed or negatively affected by another party.
Initially, experts believed all conflict was
bad. Conflict
had to be avoided or quickly resolved
conflict is
nevitable and
managers need to learn to live with it
Functional Conflict
Constructive or cooperative conflict characterized by
consultative interactions, a focus on the issues, mutual respect and
useful give and take
Dysfunctional conflict
Conflict that is detrimental to organizational goals
and objectives and threatens an organization’s interests.
The less conflict there is, the better it is for the organization.
X
All conflicts are dysfunctional.
X
Organizations can suffer from too little conflict.
O
Too much conflict can be negative for organizational
performance.
O
Integrating: Win-Win
People confront the issue and cooperatively
identify the problem, generate and evaluate
alternatives, and select a solution
- Appropriate for
- complex issues;
- when time and resources are available for
problem solving;
- when resources possessed by both parties
are needed to solve the problem
- Strength: deals with underlying problem
- Weakness: time consuming; resource needed
Win-Win
Avoiding: Lose-Lose
Obliging: Lose-Win
Low concern for the self and a great concern for
others
- Appropriate:
- when you think you may be wrong;
- when the issue is more important to the other
party;
- when you are willing to give up something in
exchange for something else;
- when preserving relationship is important
- Strength: enhances cooperation
- Weakness: temporary fix; may not fix underlying
problem
Lose-Win
Dominating: Win-Lose
“I win, you lose” tactics.
- Often called forcing
- Often relies on formal authority to
force compliance.
- Appropriate:
- when a deadline is near;
- when an unpopular solution must
be implemented;
- when the other party lacks
expertise to make decisions
- Strength: speed
- Weakness: breeds resentment
Compromising
Compromising
- A moderate concern for both self and others
- Appropriate:
- when opposing parties have opposite goals or equal power;
- when consensus cannot be reached;
- temporary solution to a complex problem is needed
- Strength: everyone gets something
- Weakness: temporary fix that can stifle problem solving
Integrating strategy in handling conflicts
* It is appropriate for complex issues
O
Integrating strategy in handling conflicts:
It is appropriate when time is available for problem solving.
true
Integrating strategy in handling conflicts:
It is appropriate when resources possessed by both parties are
needed to solve the problem
True
The ____ conflict handling strategy is characterized by high
concern for others and high concern for self.
o Integrating
o Obliging
o Avoiding
o Dominating
Integrating
The avoiding conflict handling style is characterized by:
o High concern for self and low concern for others
o High concern for others and low concern for self
o Low concern for others and low concern for self
o Moderate concern for self and others
Test your Knowledge
o Low concern for others and low concern for self
Nate is a manager at a small appliance store. He is
working with an unhappy customer who is yelling at him.
Nate’s policy on handling customer complaints is to give
the customer what they want even at a cost to the
company. This represents the _________ handling style.
o integrating
o obliging
o avoiding
o dominating
Test your Knowledge
Obliging
Intragroup Conflict: Process Conflict
+how to do this, how we’re achieving this, who will be responsible for what, think group projects
Intragroup Conflict: Task Conflict
+different thoughts on the task, what the goal is, think elphaba and Glinda
Intragroup Conflict: Relationship Conflict
+HATRED, DISLIKE, ANNOYANCE
Mark’s group tends to experience a great deal of
conflict regarding how to process tasks and who is
responsible for which task. According to Jehn and
Mannix (2001), this is known as __________ conflict.
o process
o task
o relationship
process